Triangles, explained..

Discussion in 'Walt Disney World News, Rumors and General Disc' started by See Post, Apr 9, 2010.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf


    A friendly person over at wdwmagic found this lovely tidbit about my least favorite triangles in the world from the finale of Spaceship Earth..

    "Surrounding them, Guests see an abstract version of the triangular panels that make up the surface of the exterior sphere. The panels explode into a burst of energy, representing the genesis of the next great idea. These panels follow us down the ramp, increasing in density as we reach the bottom - affirming our return to Spaceship Earth".

    <a href="http://forums.wdwmagic.com/showthread.php?t=570039" target="_blank">http://forums.wdwmagic.com/sho...t=570039</a>

    You know, that show scene various insiders insisted simply wasn't "turned on" or wired and needed this or that was screens when it wasn't and all kinds of lies and deception... The above is from the revised Epcot Imagineering field guide explaining the revamped attraction as presented.

    I win. :)
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer

    You win? Sure.


    How do you know that this is filler BS while the continue to work? Or that this is describing a coming effect?


    Do you?
     
  3. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf


    Notice ho none of your little friends are jumping to defend it..?
     
  4. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer

    Notice how some of us have lives and don't spend all day on a Disney website?


    This isn't even 12 hours old...
     
  5. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf

    I like how you constantly defer and deflect rather then ever admit you were wrong and held onto a false belief for several months - heck, aren't we at years at this point, despite tons of proof against it?

    We statements directly from the company saying they had no intention of changing the descent, that the triangles were as they intended them, and now this statement from WDI itself on the creative concept and what it's "supposed" to be.

    But you still wont admit you've been duped.
     
  6. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Merf, you're obnoxious. Guess what, people believe what they're told because they trust the people that told them. Deal with it. Don't get your panties in a bunch because people don't bow down to you.

    Oh, and there was more planned for the triangles straight from WDI's mouth.
     
  7. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf

    Really? Where?

    We have formal responses from WDW and Siemens on the matter and this is WDI's book, so where's that response?

    Like to make anything else up today..?
     
  8. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Nope, nothing made up. I worked at SSE while it was being refurbished. I talked to the show producers of the refurb daily.
     
  9. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf


    So that's why WDW guest communications and Siemens liaison on the project both responded the triangles, as installed, were the final effect as intended and presented?
     
  10. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    If you knew absolutely anything about WDW, you'd know that one hand has absolutely no idea what the other is doing. I would take anything that WDW guest communications says with the biggest grain of salt possible for things that pertain to WDI.
     
  11. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf


    And you can't say what more there was supposed to be, who this person was, how to contact them, or any way to verify your information - but if someone wants to recontact WDW guest communications of the Siemens sponsorship liaison they will get the same response on the matter.

    I did my homework.
     
  12. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf

    And if you worked there, you also know those aren't "screens."
     
  13. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Oh I could. But I won't. I could photocopy the person's business card. I can show you email correspondence I've had with them since that time.

    But I won't, because I don't feel the need to justify myself to an internet troll.
     
  14. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By mousermerf


    No, keeping a lie going is so important. Giving people false hope that it will be finished next week, next month, next year.. so wont get angry this time and complain - that's important right?

    Because that's what happened. When it was first brought up the people were upset but then people like you came in and explained it all away - just wait, there's a plan.. the plan.. wait for the plan..

    And wait.. and wait.. and wait...

    We're still waiting, it's a few years and Disney got away with it.

    Gee, thanks for that. If people had complained when it happened it might have gotten fixed.

    Long story short: Look at the damage you've done.
     
  15. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Hahahahaha! Oh merf, you're cute. There is/was a plan. The money ran out. That happens. Deal with it. I'm not some Disney super-villain trying to piss on some fan who spends way too much time trying to prove his crazy rants. I didn't tell anyone then, nor will I tell anyone now, because this person trusts me, and I'm not gonna betray that trust for you.
     
  16. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By leobloom

    >> Look at the damage you've done. <<

    Yes! By the way, Skipper, how many children have you eaten this morning?
     
  17. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    <<Yes! By the way, Skipper, how many children have you eaten this morning?>>

    2, but I've been feeling under the weather. I'd usually be at 4 by now.
     
  18. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer

    There are my friends! :)


    And really? False hope? Damage? Doom? Gloom? Are we THAT over dramatic, Ms. Merf?

    It's a theme park. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I'll admit to it. Chill it. There's no sufficient evidence, even with this slew of WDI PR mumbo jumbo, either way.
     
  19. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By Krankenstein

    I don't trust a book that makes Dino-Rama seem like it was originally intended for DAK in another volume. I'll stick by my sources that told me otherwise and no, they weren't random posts one forum.

    Btw, that explanation is from the revised "Imagineering Field Guide to Epcot".
     
  20. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By MPierce

    >> You know, that show scene various insiders insisted simply wasn't "turned on" or wired and needed this or that was screens when it wasn't and all kinds of lies and deception... The above is from the revised Epcot Imagineering field guide explaining the revamped attraction as presented.

    I win. :) <<

    I'm sure your family is proud.

    I can finally go back to sleeping at nights knowing that SSE is complete now.
     

Share This Page