Originally Posted By Princessjenn5795 The article explains itself... <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/01/20/145539661/state-bill-outlaws-use-of-fetuses-in-food-industry-meets-visceral-reaction?sc=fb&cc=fp" target="_blank">http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetw...fb&cc=fp</a>
Originally Posted By Princessjenn5795 I want to know why this guy thought there was a need for such a bill...I haven't heard about any food companies including aborted fetuses in the ingredients, and I am kinda guessing that that would have made the news. I had to make sure that it wasn't an Onion article when I first read it
Originally Posted By gurgitoy2 And as far as I can tell, the stem cells they're using are based on some taken from embryonic kidney cells in the 1970's. So...yeah, what exactly is the need for this bill, and why did he not state "stem cells" instead of "fetus" in the wordage? Oh...right, I know why...
Originally Posted By Dabob2 They can have my stash of Stem Cell Helper™ when they pry it out of my COLD, DEAD HANDS!!
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin So does that mean he gets to claim he authored an anti-choice bill? What a maroon!
