Originally Posted By dshyates Her is a link as to what to expect for the classic Disney characters that are being added to IASW. <a href="http://www.screamscape.com/html/hkdl_-_small_world_3.htm" target="_blank">http://www.screamscape.com/htm l/hkdl_-_small_world_3.htm</a>
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 Like I said in the other thread, very well done, if the other characters are like this, it'll meld together extremely well.
Originally Posted By Britain Sorry, ain't buyin it. Blairized Aliens still don't belong in Small World.
Originally Posted By dshyates I should have added that this is from he HKDL version. I have no idea if Stitch will be aded to the DL version.
Originally Posted By FerretAfros Lilo just looks a little too happy. Did she get botox? And what kind of scares me is that I think we all recognize that scene from our iasw, so there's a pretty good chance that the little boy will "magically" turn into Lilo. I wonder how Hawaiians feel about this movie portraying their homeland to the world, especially since it's not based in any local stories or traditions. It could have just as easily been set in Topeka, Kansas, but wouldn't have been as pretty to look at.
Originally Posted By jonvn Well, that certainly looks like a hunk of plastic, doesn't it? Just like the unpleasant cartoon characters in the Tarzan Treehouse now.
Originally Posted By utahjosh <It could have just as easily been set in Topeka, Kansas, but wouldn't have been as pretty to look at.> I think Chris Sander's original concept of the movie had a boy living in Kansas meeting Stitch.
Originally Posted By dshyates "Well, that certainly looks like a hunk of plastic, doesn't it?" What?!? Didn't you see the glitter on his ears? "Ok boys and girls, Let's KICK IT up a notch. BAM!!! (pinch of glitter)" And the crowd goes wild.
Originally Posted By lesmisfan lilo honestly doesn't look to bad. but stitch just looks so out of place.
Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA Okay, having seen this picture of Lilo and Stitch in the setting, I'm going to go on record and say 'I like it.'
Originally Posted By amazedncal2 I think it's kind of cute Like during the Christmas overlay when they added a Flounder toy to the Mermaid's Christmas stocking. I'm looking at it like they are adding rather than subtracting.
Originally Posted By Hans Reinhardt He looks completely out of scale to me. Look for the plush version in the gift shop at the exit.
Originally Posted By danyoung YAAAYYY - Jim shows good sense! I've said from the beginning that I'm not wild about these changes. But as long as they're careful and do it right, I'm fine with it. The 2 pieces of art I've seen so far look pretty good to me.
Originally Posted By mawnck >>I wonder how Hawaiians feel about this movie portraying their homeland to the world<< I wonder how Hawaiians feel about all this talk about them as though they were a foreign country. >>I think it's kind of cute << The crux of the problem. Those of us who think of an attraction as a cohesive presentation, and those of us who think of it as a boat ride past cute things. If it's good enough for Six Flags ...
Originally Posted By dshyates I can understand how they can rationalize Alice in England. Lewis Carrol is a famous English authr and "Through the Looking Glass" is an English literary treasure as s Peter and Wendy. So I can see them tying the Disney characters back into the folklore and history/literature of the countries. But how in Walt's name can they justify Stitch. He's not from Hawaiian folklore. Nor a significant piece of Hawaiian literature. He's a Saturday Morning ABC cartoon character. A lesser star the Scooby Doo.
Originally Posted By mawnck >>A lesser star the Scooby Doo.<< Whoa, now, let's don't go that far! I have nothing whatsoever against Stitch, as he was the star of one of the few really good hand-drawn features in recent years. But adding curlicues to his ears doesn't qualify him for inclusion in iasw!
Originally Posted By dshyates "Whoa, now, let's don't go that far! I have nothing whatsoever against Stitch,..." But what do you have against Scooby Doo. So what if he got he start on the small screen. He's put his time in. And his early stuff is classic. Although by the end of the 70s he was pretty strung out. And that really hurt is early 80s stuff. But he's pulled it together, and has franchised his brand pretty well. I hear he hooked up with the same guy who pulled Areosmith's career back together. Not surprising with as tight as Scooby is with Steven Tyler and all. Yeah, you didn't know? Uh huh, yeah, they met at Betty Ford's.
Originally Posted By mawnck >>But what do you have against Scooby Doo.<< His diction is even worse than Stitch's.
