Originally Posted By Skellington88 Just so yuo guys know a Monsters Inc. show is going to replace Timekeeper and ANOTHER monsters inc. ride (probably a clone of the DCA version) is going to open at MGM studios in 2008. This is lame . Is Disney going to just keep converting the parks into pixarland?
Originally Posted By ssWEDguy >> Is Disney going to just keep converting the parks into pixarland? << Forgive me for asking -- This is bad?
Originally Posted By vbdad55 <>> Is Disney going to just keep converting the parks into pixarland? << < By summer wouldn't this be Disneyland anyway ?
Originally Posted By Labuda No problems with how they sound, bloona, but skellington88 here has had a brief history of coming here on LP and posting wild rumors with no basis in fact.
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Skellington you must think we are complete idiots! Your claim makes no sense. WDW would never put TWO attractions from the same movie in, EVEN if they were at different parks. Go away and don't come back until you have something better than that to spread through the rumor mill.
Originally Posted By BlazesOfFire There were rumors before, however, that a Monsters Inc ride would replace Timekeeper, but have not heard of the other claim for MGM.
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo Careful DVC_DAD: "Skellington you must think we are complete idiots! Your claim makes no sense. WDW would never put TWO attractions from the same movie in, EVEN if they were at different parks. " Finding Nemo - 2 attractions in the Living Seas and 1 at DAK. Lion King was represented in Fantasyland and DAK at the same time for a while. 20K under the Sea and Journey to the Centre of the Earth at TDS. Alice in Wonderland and the Teacups at DL, Alice's Curious Labrynth and Teacups DLP. Dumbo and Casey Jr. at DL and DLP Peter Pan and Adventure Isle with Skull Rock at DLP. You were saying?
Originally Posted By NJFIREGUY <<WDW would never put TWO attractions from the same movie in, EVEN if they were at different parks.>> **Cough** Nemo - EPCOT **Cough** Nemo - AK
Originally Posted By Disneymom443 I've heard good reviews on DCA's Monsters attration. Would it be so bad to have it at Epcot? This movie was a big $$$ maker for Disney, people love it.
Originally Posted By Skellington88 Im a troll? Im telling you whats being talked about and you attack me? I dont say things that arent based in fact. Two Monsters inc. rides are about to get dumped into WDW wether you like it or not. Its funny people in the Disneyland section of this and various other sites treat me with respect and don't insult me and are willing to discuss but then I come to the Disneyworld forums and I get jumped. Unbelievable.
Originally Posted By Skellington88 Btw thank you davewasbaloo and njfireguy for providing assistance educating these apperantly simple folk.
Originally Posted By leemac It does seem very unlikely that DCA's dark ride will make it to D-MGM. There is definitely nothing on the drawing boards for that right now. The Monsters, Inc. ride for TL is a possibility but the Incredibles ride for TL is a higher priority now. Timekeeper is just getting gutted right now, nothing else.
Originally Posted By RoadTrip So you have one show and one ride based on the same story. So what? The two attractions really aren't comparable in my mind. Beside, the shows are not permanent additions, as has been shown before by: Captain EO Magic Journeys Legend of the Lion King Hunchback of Notre Dame Jungle Book show at the AK Tarzan Rocks etc, etc. Even if the OP is correct, it is a HUGE "so what?" as far as I'm concerned.
Originally Posted By Skellington88 The Incredibles will use a new ride system that is sort of a hybrid between the Robotic Arm and the EMV. Think like a next generation version of Spider-Man at IOA. The plan is to tear down COP, Galaxy Theater and the Skyway station to build a new building to house the attraction. Its going to be impressive but im not as hyped about it only because its yet another Pixar ride. Oh well...as long as we get some Narnia and Star Wars love along the way I wont mind too much.
