Originally Posted By HMButler79 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvLExG8CAQE&feature=share" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...re=share</a> So we're going from a ride that has EIGHT show scenes, SIX Witches, TWO Queens, THREE Snow White's, FOURTEEN Dwarf figures, ONE Skeleton, and ONE Prince to......TWO, count em....TWO SCENES and and only one of them is indoors! Way to upgrade WDI!!!
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Yeah, It doesn't look that impressive. Needs lots more plot and story.
Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA These are quick clips from the new ride. For me, it looks like fun!
Originally Posted By A Happy Haunt It does look cute! I don't need to scream bloody murder on every ride!! Fun, Fun, Fun!!
Originally Posted By leobloom The ride vehicle is clearly the special thing here. The actual scenery on the ride appears to be extremely skimpy. But who knows? Maybe it'll turn out better than the computer rendering makes it out to be.
Originally Posted By GOB Wait a second, we actually have apologists here for the Snow White dark ride? It's incredible that folks are so easy to judge an attraction based on 30 seconds (less than a quarter of the ride's rumored length) of a computer visualization, when the ride hasn't even begun construction yet.
Originally Posted By Goofyernmost ^^^^I trust you are talking about the negative as well as the positive judgments? The use of the word "apologists" seem to imply that you are only focusing on the positive remarks, but that he negative ones are right on. Hopefully, I am wrong about this.
Originally Posted By GOB >>^^^^I trust you are talking about the negative as well as the positive judgments? The use of the word "apologists" seem to imply that you are only focusing on the positive remarks, but that he negative ones are right on. Hopefully, I am wrong about this.<< I was referring to the (rather generous) description of Snow White's Scary Adventures that was provided in the original post, and then the inferring of its superiority to an attraction that has yet to be constructed.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Well, there's a point in that. SWSA at least has a lot of theme and story going for it. SWSA II might just be all movement and thrill.
Originally Posted By Lee hisownself The Mine Ride > old Snow White ride. In every way. Downgrade....please...
Originally Posted By CuriousConstance I think it looks like fun too. But I might be biased, I tend to like to disagree with anything HMButler says.
Originally Posted By Bellella Somehow I never saw anything from "Snow White" as being on a thrill ride. Is this the new theme now? Are we going to have more character-themed roller coasters?
Originally Posted By SuperDry I think it looks like a lot of fun. I'd much rather see a mix of rides, including this one, rather than just four classic FL dark rides (using 1955 technology).
Originally Posted By HMButler79 So fun in post-Eisner Disney is now looking at trees w/ ONE show scene. Amazing.
Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA Who says you're seeing all the she scenes in that clip HMButle79? It looks like a mini Big Thunder..,
Originally Posted By leobloom The lack of immersive show scenes makes this look like Everest's little brother. I suspect the ride will be fun, and the vehicles will create a neat sensation. But the problem, as I see it, is that this glorified kiddie coaster isn't nearly enough to pull WDW out of its slump. What the resort needs is a grand slam, and this isn't it.
Originally Posted By HMButler79 Jim it's very common knowledge that there will only be two show scenes. The Dwarves Mine (TWICE), and the Cottage finale (which we now pass by, we no longer ride through the whole thing)
