TEA Theme Park Attendance Report

Discussion in 'Walt Disney World News, Rumors and General Disc' started by See Post, Jun 17, 2011.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ChiMike

    Attendance in M, Growth or Loss in Percentage, Name, Location
    16.97 M -1.5% Magic Kingdom, Orlando, FL
    15.98 M +0.5% Disneyland, Anaheim, CA
    14.45 M +5.9% Tokyo Disneyland, Tokyo, Japan
    12.66 M +5.5% Tokyo DisneySea, Tokyo, Japan
    10.83 M -1.5% EPCOT, Orlando, FL
    10.50 M -2.6% Disneyland Paris, Marne-la-Vallee, Fran ce
    9.87 M +1.0% Disney’s Animal Kingdom, Kissimmee, FL
    9.60 M -1.0% Disney’s Hollywood Studios, Orlando, FL
    8.16 M +2.0% Universal Studios Japan, Osaka, Japan
    6.88 M +11.6% Everland, South Korea
    6.29 M +3.0% Disney California Adventure, Anaheim, CA
    5.95 M +30.2% Islands of Adventure, Orlando FL
    5.93 M +6.1% Universal Studios, Orlando FL
    5.55 M +22.4% Lotte World, Seoul, South Korea
    5.20 M +13.0% Hong Kong Disneyland, Hong Kong
    5.10 M -12.1% SeaWorld Florida, Orlando, FL
    5.10 M +6.3% Ocean Park, Hong Kong
    5.04 M +26.0% Universal Studios Hollywood, Universal City, CA
    4.50 M -2.6% Walt Disney Studios, Marne-la-Vallee, France
    4.47 M -5.0% Nagashima Spa Land, Kuwana Japan
    4.25 M 0.0 Europa Park, Rust Germany
    4.20 M +2.4% Busch Gardens Tampa Bay, Tampa FL
    4.02 M -6.0% Yokohama Sea Paradise, Japan
    4.00 M 0.0% De Efteling, The Netherlands
    3.80 M -9.5% SeaWorld California, San Diego, CA

    Only AK saw a rise in attendance, and that was very modest. All the while, Orlando sees a 10%+ increase in regional tourism.
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By alexbook

    What's the time span for this? 2010 vs. 2009?
     
  3. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ChiMike

    I believe so.
     
  4. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By alexbook

    Okay, yeah, here's a thread in the DL section with more details:
    <a href="http://mb.laughingplace.com/MsgBoard-T-120339-P-1.asp" target="_blank">http://mb.laughingplace.com/Ms...-P-1.asp</a>

    Here's the TEA's editorial bit:
    >>“The 2010 TEA/AECOM Theme Index reveals an average attendance increase
    of 1.8 percent in North American parks, with many sectors at or close to prerecession
    levels,” said John Robinett, senior vice president, Economics at
    AECOM. “The major players saw mixed results, but the trend was generally
    positive. Both Universal and Disney parks reaped the rewards of substantial
    reinvestment with outstanding new attractions in Orlando and Los Angeles.
    Orlando saw regional tourism grow by 10.5 percent and preliminary
    estimates indicate 8 percent growth in Los Angeles. Both residents and
    tourists are coming back to the parks.”

    “The remarkable success of Universal Studios’ Wizarding World of Harry
    Potter lifted attendance at Universal’s two parks in Orlando by more than 1.7
    million visitors in 2010,” said Brian Sands, AICP, vice president, Economics
    at AECOM. “Universal Studios Hollywood was also up significantly due
    to the opening of King Kong 360 3-D. World of Color, at Disney California
    Adventure, helped offset a mostly flat year for Disney parks. These are great
    examples of how valuable strong content and excellent execution are for the
    themed entertainment industry, in what remains a challenging economic
    environment.”<<
     
  5. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Surprised IoA wasn't above 6 million, butit's still pretty impressive how much of a boost Potter gave them for only being open 1/2 a year. This year's attendance should be even better.

    DHS and Epcot dropped 1% and 1.5% each. Time for something new and exciting in both, I think.
     
  6. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    Also, the fact that USF also rose in attendance along with IoA shows that people are indeed going to Universal for the entire RESORT, rather than just a day like most people were speculating before Potter.
     
  7. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By joe80x86

    Notice the 12% drop at Seaworld though. Even with them having opened a new coaster. Aquatica also saw a 6% drop.
     
  8. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By joe80x86

    Also According to what was posted in the DL section thread there is an interesting change over the years for UO and IOA:

    Park 2001 2010
    UO 7.2mil 5.9mil
    IOA 5.5mil 5.9mil
     
  9. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    ^^ Yep. If you add those numbers together it's a net loss of .9 million visitors in 2010 over 2001. What's even more interesting is that in 2001 both UO and IOA were down from the previous year.
     
  10. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    "DHS and Epcot dropped 1% and 1.5% each. Time for something new and exciting in both, I think."

    Think again. The combined attendance at UO and IOA in 2010 was 4 million less than the entire year for the MK. I don't disagree that Disney needs to step up its game, but certainly not because of anything going on up the road at Universal.
     
  11. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By davewasbaloo

    But do not these losses at Uni tally with Magic Express starting as well as the likely drop off at the beginning of the year while the WWoHP were under construction. Just Like I suspect we will see a large for 2012 when DCA Phase 2 is complete.
     
  12. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    Maybe Dave, but DCA has been running increases for the past several years while major sections of the park have continuously been behind construction walls, and it won't end until next summer. It's probably an apples and oranges comparison since the two resorts have vastly different audiences (locals vs vacationers), so draw your own conclusions.
     
  13. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By davewasbaloo

    No doubt TSMM and WoC brought people in (hence the rise) and Little Mermaid will continue the trend. But I think when all the construction walls come down and Cars Land is open, we will see quite a climb in DCA. I know dozens of Europeans who all want to go, but are waiting. One friend cancelled 2 trips to DLP this year, took a short weekend to Rome instead and put the rest of his money in the bank to go to DLR in 2012.

    Then again, the first click thing means we may not get a full view.

    As for DHS, I thought that Star Tours 2 would help it, but if the queues were shorter for it than that stupid video game ride in the park during Star Wars weekend, then probably not.

    Maybe F! being back on will help too.
     
  14. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    I think one thing that every theme park operator has to envy about Disney is its HUGE built in audience. The fact that DLP can be literally falling to pieces and operate without any major new attractions and still rank in the top ten attended parks in the world says something.
     
  15. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Christi22222

    ^^Yes it does say something. And Disney banks on that something to get feet throught the turnstiles even when the parks don't deserve it. But there are clear changes in trends here, and that should be a red flag to anyone at Disney. Momentum can take them quite a ways, but I see these numbers as saying not all the way.
     
  16. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    I get your point, but the numbers published yesterday don't really say much to me other than Universal had a significant bump from Potter and possibly siphoned a few guests away from WDW. Whether this is a long term trend or not is yet to be seen. Even with the slight drop last year, Disney's numbers are way up in 2010 over 2001 (a benchmark for a bad year in the industry) while Universal's attendance is down.
     
  17. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    <<Think again. The combined attendance at UO and IOA in 2010 was 4 million less than the entire year for the MK. I don't disagree that Disney needs to step up its game, but certainly not because of anything going on up the road at Universal. >>

    Where did I say the two were related?
     
  18. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By HokieSkipper

    <<^^ Yep. If you add those numbers together it's a net loss of .9 million visitors in 2010 over 2001. What's even more interesting is that in 2001 both UO and IOA were down from the previous year.>>

    And? They're bringing people back in in droves. IoA will be close to if not over 7 million next year, and USF will be around 6.5.
     
  19. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt

    "Where did I say the two were related?"

    You didn't. I jumped to conclusions.
     
  20. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By dshyates

    "I don't disagree that Disney needs to step up its game, but certainly not because of anything going on up the road at Universal."

    I disagree. While IOA's numbers are in a different ball park. Those of us that love themed entertainment are in agreement that Universal Creative is kicking WDI's mouse tail in attraction development. And I believe that Transformers will reiterate the point.

    Now outside the competitive issues. WDW saw an across the board decline (save DAK) while central Fl saw a 10% increase, and Universal saw a massive increase. All while offering free dining. Universal may have siphoned off a few Disney days. But I believe the increased traffic to Cent. FL actually added people to Disney's numbers. As in the Mouse rode Potter's robe tails into JUST a modest decrease. I believe that had Universal NOT have opened Potter, WDW's numbers would have been far less impressive.
     

Share This Page