Originally Posted By donnyaz I saw this and it creeped me out. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFnmTVwSIp4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...mTVwSIp4</a>
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder Interesting. I worked with surveillance cameras for over 20 years. One, maybe two of the explanations are likely and plausible, some are just bogus. The anomaly walking through New Orleans Square that he writes off as a burned monitor image is not a practical explanation. First of all, it would be the lens of the camera that would be problematic in explaining why the anomaly he decides is an employee that's there, but not completely not seen. Yes, monitors have images burned into them, but only if the image they show is a stationary one shown continuously on the screen, and those burned images would always be seen, no matter what the camera sees. This anomaly is seen on TWO screens from cameras that are moving. BOTH monitors have the SAME problem from slightly different angles? What he doesn't explain is why everything else in the shot is shown just fine and why only the anomaly is not displayed clearly by the monitor. Monitors cannot be selectively in what they display, especially when it comes to moving images. This anomaly just happened to walk across parts of the monitor screen that were flawed? No way. It might be an emloyee, but it isn't an employee from that night. Plus, he never explains how the employee walks on water. The Space Mountain explanation is also suspect. The formless anomaly getting in next to the guy is not a reflection of someone off camera. No way. The anomaly seems to run the length of the train, which he conveniently doesn't mention. It MIGHT be a reflection of moving overhead lights, but he doesn't say that either. Also, as the train moves, if that's a reflection of the ride operator through frosted glass, which if anything frosted glass would frustrate any image projection, he doesn't address how the image stays in the seat right next to the guy in the brown shirt. The first Tower of Terror explanation is the worst of the bunch. The debunker claims strobe lights cause the ride tech to be seen in two different seats, but the image behind the tech is CLEARLY not the tech. The tech still has his hat on and is wearing glasses and a jacket. The image/anomaly is on screen long enough for anyone to pause it and see that the image is a completely different person. No hat, no jacket, no glasses, high forehead, head tilted differently. The other image, screen left and to the right of the tech, is also CLEARLY not the tech. If anything, it's a headless person with a light colored top. The tech has a head and a dark jacket. The tech also looked somewhat surprised he lost his hat during what presumably is a ride test. The fireworks explanation might have been inserted just to give the debunker some credibility. However, his explanation is easily verifiable, so if he's not right, he's full of it here too. During the fireworks over the castle, a person/anomaly can clearly be seen on one of the castle roofs. The debunker says the person is disguised on purpose and is a safety monitor. It's the most plausible explanation given so far, and too easy to debunk the debunker. I've never heard of such a monitor, which doesn't mean anything, but you can tell from the tone of the debunker's voice he's likely guessing too. The image does seem to be a bit too large a proportion for the shot, but other than that, even the way the image fades away as opposed to walks out of range can make sense if the person is dressed like the debunker claims. The image of a man in the Grotto by the castle takes some studying to see, but once you see it, you can't miss it. It does come off a lot like saying someone saw the image of the Virgin Mary in grilled cheese sandwich, but if this is a discolorization of the rocks, funny how that gets picked up at night in bad lighting. If it is the rocks and not some ghostly anomaly, it is also easily verifiable by going to those same rocks, because that sure looks like the image of a man with a goatee and a light shirt. Another clip that might be inserted for credibility. The last one of the Tower of Terror balcony image, you have to wonder why he put it in the video. It's either a part of the ride or there's an anomaly there. I didn't wade through all the comments on You Tube to see if anyone spoke up about that, because a lot of the comments seem to be written by drunk 12 year olds.
Originally Posted By Lady Starlight I believe that there are spirits walking this earth around us.It would be fun to actually know for sure when one is caught on film. Alot of ghost sightings can be debunked,but some really make you wonder. I like the one's that make you wonder. <--- likes ghost hunting.
Originally Posted By cheezman20 i haven't seen the original footage, but motion tracking is fun and i like putting ghosts or whatever into camcorder footage. i do it all the time. whether or not this is what happened with that footage, i don't know... but i think everything the narrator of that video said was inaccurate. he seemed to be having fun, though.
Originally Posted By trekkeruss My problem with a lot of these ghost images caught on film: the human eye is much more sensitive than a regular camera, video or otherwise. That's why non-professionals take bad photographs and movies, because they assume what their eyes see will be picked up by their camera or camcorder. With that in mind, how is it these ordinary cameras see what apparently no humans are seeing? Also, how do I know these videos haven't been doctored post-production, with anomalies added after the fact?
Originally Posted By cheezman20 especially with static images (like the security cams) it is really easy to overlay the images.
Originally Posted By Lady Starlight I have PROOF ghosts DO exist! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L2lDHNmRFw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...lDHNmRFw</a> Need more proof? This one's not for the squeemish or faint of heart. I'm just sayin'. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXY-ic561iA&feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...=related</a>
Originally Posted By MomluvsDisney Try this one...grin..I think it has posted before, but I thought I would share it again! <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/fd88cb9dda/danger-at-disneyland-from-schmalz" target="_blank">http://www.funnyordie.com/vide...-schmalz</a>
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 I have PROOF ghosts DO exist! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...lDHNmRFw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...lDHNmRFw</a> Need more proof? This one's not for the squeemish or faint of heart. I'm just sayin'. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...=related<<" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...<<</a> Those are such poor special effects, it's not even funny....
Originally Posted By Lady Starlight WK99, yes. That was the point. They were so lame that it was supposed to be silly.
Originally Posted By trekkeruss <<I stopped it after 2 mins, didn;t see the punchline>> So you missed seeing the ghost fall down the stairs.
Originally Posted By Lady Starlight MlD, I saw that one befor too. LOL That was such a fun take, on the whole " a ghost will follow you home" thing. Thanks for posting that. It was fun to see again.
