Originally Posted By Inkan1969 There's an interesting connection between WDW and Kara Monaco, Playboy Magazine's new Playmate of the Year. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/gu9zh" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/gu9zh</a> "A FORMER Walt Disney World dancer who used to dress up as Cinderella and Snow White"
Originally Posted By vbdad55 getting the mental image of the Playboy bunny flying through the open window andinto the room of the teenage boy in Animal House.
Originally Posted By trailsend I realize I've already seen the article, but looking through the picture gallery . . .honestly made me sad. I'm not exactly sure why, but it did. I know these talented kids at Disney get to go onto many things, but Playboy, I dunno . . .it just kind of makes me sad. Not being judgmental at all, honestly, just that it just seems wrong for Snow White or Cinderella to be involved with Playboy. *sad face* or maybe *disappointed face* And honestly, Hugh Hefner is one ugly dude. And that was a LOT of blonde (?) hair sitting around that table with him. only my $.02
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Well I have been waiting for the call to go do a Playboy spread but so far the phone hasn't rang.
Originally Posted By NJFIREGUY ^^^ Well Thats cause your DVC_"DAD" <<<I think it's sad when anyone does a Playboy spread. >>> Yes I agree, But its a "hidden Saddness" for me sometimes I forget just how much it upsets me and have to go buy an issue to remind myself. oh the horror
Originally Posted By NikkiLOVESMickey Just a general question to the guys on this board - if our wife or girlfriend was offered a Playboy spread, would you be upset if she decided to do it?
Originally Posted By vbdad55 It would be her choice.....I am sure the obvious ( oh our friends will all be looking ! ) concerns would arise, but really it would be her decision and I would go along either way. Also I think I may not have been so open to this when we were younger...as time goes by you realize what's really an 'issue' and what isn't
Originally Posted By Coachbagfanatic1 Oh, my husband would be all for it. If I was younger than maybe. It does not bother me that someone does a Playboy spread. If I knew a person who did one, just as long as they treat me with respect, I couldn't care less. One of my really good friends is a dancer and it does not change my mind about her what so ever. She is still a wonderful person. JMO
Originally Posted By allygator206 IMO Passing judgement on someone based on a singular action or trait speaks more on the judging individual than it does on the person who commits action or holds that trait. ) Women who choose to present themselves in a sexual way and even those that take it a step further and pose nude are all unique so it's hard to say whether it is "wrong". Like most things, it's all based on circumstances... Of course the connection between Disney and Playboy is slightly disturbing...
Originally Posted By NikkiLOVESMickey Well, I have little regard for someone who shows her "bits and pieces" in a magazine purely for tittilation's sake. If it's art it's different, but Playboy isn't art. I have just as little use for women who run around dressed in a sexually suggestive manner as well. I just don't think it's classy, and if that speaks negatively about me as an individual, well it just shows how whacked the values of our society are. I don't believe that we should walk around completely covered up, but seeing someone walk around barely dressed is offensive to me. It's one thing to look sexy, it's another to look trashy.
Originally Posted By NJFIREGUY >> I just don't think it's classy, and if that speaks negatively about me as an individual, well it just shows how whacked the values of our society are<< That opinion doesnt speak negatively as an individual...Now if you met the girl and she was nice as could be was a wonderful person and you(or anyone) just decided that because she did playboy she was a bad person...well that would be wrong. it pays to remember that once upon a time. The Music we listen to, the shows we watch even the clothes you wear were considered "obescene".
