Originally Posted By YourPalEd Bush is trying to convince the ignorant that no attacks after 9/11 is a good thing, when actually they are resonsible for the 9/11 attack. An honest president would have resigned on the spot for failing the republic. He should have been arrested or he should have resigned withen 10 minutes of the airplane attacks for failing to protect america. The fact these cowards use our government to hide their failures, prove they were not failures, but planned attacks on 11/2000, and 9/11, and on, and on. They lowered our defenses and allowed 9/11 to happen, just like they lost the 11/2000 election and forced the media to say they won. They forced the war in iraq, against the wishes of all the american people, but the immoral few. These sick criminals, with no respect for god, continue to sin, and destroy everywhere they go. Clinton had no attacks on american soil, we weren't even at war during his wonderful 8 years of democrats controlling the senate and white house. The only criminal action was kenneth starr and the criminals who shut down our government, before christmas. Because of the republican criminals in the house they shut down the government that christmas. So actually monica lewinsky was an intern, and clinton was not officially working in the office when his sex capade occured, but again the criminals, kept the truth out of the media, because they wanted america to get back to making war. A military ship, the cole, gets attacked, only, but sadly, 50 american military men and women die. Clinton sends one 12 million dollar missile, and uses $54 million planning and carrying out a military strike, on the terrorists who carried out the cole bombing. No war, no terrorist attacks on our soil. The cia, and fbi intelligence, perfect, as always, at least when honest democrats are running the government, together they created a pinpoint strike in the heart of the terrorist group, quieting them down for years, while they are watched and followed everywhere, until the criminal cheney, pulls everyone off the surveilance of the terrorists, and they roam our country, and then attack on 9/11 according to cheney's plan. One $54 million dollar mission by clinton, and the terrorists are taken care of. The terrorists can only distort accounts and say it was a baby's milk factory, but no more bombs for a while. Here's the difference with the lying republican traitors at the helm... Bush allows a multi-billion dollar attack to occur in the united states, by pulling off surveilance on known terrorists being watched. The attacks on the pentagon, and new york city, on 9/11, happen as planned, and decided. The attack on the pentagon planned by cheney was to allow censorship of all media by the military, then he places in new positions, like psychiatrist, and other non government jobs, to place his minions into the heart of our government. Bush and cheney, spends $11 trillion giving it to incompetent, ignorant republican buddies of his, to illegally attack iraq, after lying to the united nations, and declaring a war against a noun, terror, which only exists when republicans are allowed to run any of the three branchs of american government. Suddenly, we are surrounded by high school dropouts with guns. Highschool dropout republicans with guns do not make me feel more secure, they make you feel less secure. People paid to carry guns, who drive around in gas wasting hunks of metal, instead of smaller gas saving cars. Republicans values are a joke, as are all republicans. The fact they are selfdestructive is evident by how they prefer to make their nightmares become real, instead of their happy dreams. Cheney himself talks about his nightmares on the news without realizing he is describing the situation he has created in iraq, the war, and development of a breeding ground of terrorists. Bush sr. with cheney and rumsfeld, had already started their sick nightmare plans with the first iraq war being forced on america. That was okay as long as american soldiers were not involved. Money spent is fine as long as military personel is not involved. Get the democrats back in government so intelligent people can use american technology again. It doesn't matter how much surgery equipment you have, or if it's the latest. An operation will never be successful with a three year old surgeon, who can barely read. Cheney is selfdestructive. His nightmare vision has become the iraq war, and the growth of terrorism, verbatim.
Originally Posted By ecdc "Clinton had no attacks on american soil, we weren't even at war during his wonderful 8 years of democrats controlling the senate and white house." Errr... I hate the "9/11 is Clinton's fault" line as much as the next guy, but we did have the WTC bombing in '93 and the Timothy McVeigh bombing. Neither Clinton nor Bush did enough to stop bin Laden and 9/11, and I say that as a big Clinton fan.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh I don't think so woody. There have been hundreds of carbomb attacks in Iraq. Each one of those is a terrorist attack.
Originally Posted By YourPalEd I wasn't counting mcveigh he is considered a disgruntled republican. Well, then i guess that was bush's excuse for letting america be attacked on 9/11 he wanted more money, he was a disgruntled criminal who wanted more money, from the wealthy americans. Bush the traitor.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy Ed, the very welcome mainstream liberal on LP who actually says what the others only dare think.
Originally Posted By DlandDug (Since embassies are also considered American soil, the bombing of two American embassies in Africa also happened under Clinton. So the present score would actually be Clinton 4*- Bush 1. But the game isn't over, so feel free to continue rooting for your team!) *I will not include military targets in the count, such as the Marine barracks or the USS Cole. That would be CHEATING.
Originally Posted By BlueState_Republican Ed is dangerous. I hope homeland is watching him and his posts here.
Originally Posted By Shooba I would hope that Homeland Security is monitoring the actions of terrorists and/or potential terrorists, and not watching the postings of a nut on a message board.
Originally Posted By YourPalEd <<<Ed is dangerous. I hope homeland is watching him and his posts here.>>> Hope? You know i've been thoroughly checked out for years, and found completely honest, or as honest as a faulty human can be. You on the other hand have not been investigated yet.
Originally Posted By cmpaley Why would the Bush administration want to investigate someone who agrees with them. They only investigate political "enemies" in order to intimidate them into shutting up. Fortunately, they aren't having much success. It's starting to show, too. Bush almost threw a tantrum at his last press conference.
Originally Posted By wahooskipper It's a good think that Democrats never investigate people with whom they don't agree. Yeah...right.
Originally Posted By YourPalEd It is a rather hyper-critical time of accute scrutiny of everyone. People are more impressed by bush's abillity to keep his vile secrets, and not the disasters he has caused everywhere, that he wants to take credit for, for some reason, only a fool would understand. "Look at me! I just invaded a country and bombed the hell out of it cause i found out i could," said george, smiling, waving on the deck of the big airplane launching ship, called an aircraft carrier.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy <<It's starting to show, too. Bush almost threw a tantrum at his last press conference.>> No he didn't. He is finally however pushing back against the dopey liberal press who ask him dopey liberal questions day after day. I'm surprised he is as nice to them as he is.
