Originally Posted By itsme In a day or 2 we should know what for, who or no one, is/not going to be indicted for the Plame thing. Anyone care to go on record with their best guess, Will anyone if indicted step down or lose their job, and what will the opposite/same parties say afterwards. I say at least 3 or 4 people will get indicted for outing her, obstruction of justice, perjury and maybe a few lesser things. No one will step down or be fired and we will be told by the right that we need to wait until after everyone gets their day in court to really see if any crimes were committed, the left will freak out how corrupt, hypocritical, arrogant and not caring the right is for how they handle things. Then after the next pres election everyone will get pardoned and this will all be a big waste of time and money like usual.
Originally Posted By TomSawyer Rove indicted for obstruction of justice and perjury. Libby indicted for obstruction of justice, perjury and it wouldn't surprise me if he was indicted for revealing the identity of an undercover CIA agent as well. I think that a new grand jury will investigate other things that have been revealed in this investigation. I think Bush will follow his father's footsteps and pardon everyone involved, since he's more concerned about watching out for his friends than he is about doing what's right. Karl Rove will become a regular contributor to Fox News and will eventually have his own show.
Originally Posted By Jafar30 <<since he's more concerned about watching out for his friends than he is about doing what's right.>> Granted I'm not the President, but I've certainly watched out for my friends more than doing the right thing.
Originally Posted By planodisney Tom Sawyer, why would you leave off all of the disgusting pardons clinton handed out? You are so biased and unfair my friend. Shame, shame, shame.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan I predict that, if indicted, Karl Rove will sprain a lip trying to flash an even toothier over-compensation grin in his mugshot than current record holder Tom DeLay.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy Does anyone ACTUALLY think an indictment is coming down for outing an "undercover" CIA agent??? BWAAAHAAAAAAHAAAHAAAAAA This might turn out to be a case of no crime until the investigation caught someone forgetting some conversations from a few years ago. Quick.... can anyone tell us everything they posted on here 2 years ago and who you said it to? Good luck. This is basically what we are down to with Libby and Rove. But who cares.... The left and the libs who can't win an election to save their life and are viewed as American hating reprobates can use these " charges " to try and make the other guys who kick their ass look bad...at least this is what they hope and think. Again, do they really think America can't see right through all of this???
Originally Posted By TomSawyer It's going to be fun watching you spin the news in the next week or two, Beau.
Originally Posted By TomSawyer Fitzgerald's team just rented more office space in Washington. Funny thing for someone to do who is closing down an investigation... unless he's just getting started on something based on information from the White House folks who've turned.
Originally Posted By Darkbeer Maybe the current jury us going to come back with nothing, and Fitzgerald will try again with a new grand jury???? <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-102605leak_lat" target="_blank">http://www.latimes.com/news/na tionworld/nation/la-102605leak_lat</a>,0,668287.story?coll=la-home-headlines >>A third possibility was that Fitzgerald was seeking the judge's permission to extend the term of the grand jury. But people close to the case said they considered that unlikely. Among other factors, they noted that the grand jury that Fitzgerald has been using has already been extended once, and that federal court rules do not provide for further extensions. At the same time, it was possible that he was discussing with the judge using another grand jury to present his case, these sources said. <<
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By TomSawyer Or that he wants to empanel a new grand jury to look at more issues unveiled during his investigation.
Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder But Darkbeer selectively cutting and pasting anything? Heavens, no! Heck, who are we kidding? He's been selectively cutting and pasting on a myriad of web sites for years now. First time I ever came across his screen name was someone calling him out on it over at mouseplanet about 4-5 years ago.
Originally Posted By planodisney Unlike you guys who are famous for presenting both sides of every issue.
Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder "Unlike you guys who are famous for presenting both sides of every issue." Exactly. You've been paying attention.
Originally Posted By planodisney StillThePassHolder, when are you going to give up this ridiculous masquerade of pretending to be a republican. Do you think anybody still believes that nonsense?
Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder "StillThePassHolder, when are you going to give up this ridiculous masquerade of pretending to be a republican." The alleged Republicans now in the forefront bear no resemblance whatsoever to the Republican party I first registered to join in 1976. Profligate spending, record deficits, pandering to the extreme right.... "Do you think anybody still believes that nonsense?" The nonsense, I imagine, is that you see yourself as one.
Originally Posted By SuperDry <<< The left and the libs who can't win an election to save their life and are viewed as American hating reprobates >>> You keep repeating the same thing over and over and over again. You've yet to come to terms with the fact that the people that "can't win elections" got 49% of the vote in the last presidential election. And that was well before the 2000th soldier lost their life in Iraq, before the indictments, before the cronyism in important appointments was apparent, and before a lot of other things. We'll let the future elections be judges for themselves as to who will win and who won't. And I notice your arguments about the CIA leak bear striking resemblance to what Sean Hannity and the rest of the noise machine have been saying about them. The fact that they've devoted so much time to this issue recently shows you how worried they are. And it's interesting that they appear to be using up some of the "dry powder" about the liberal media that they've been building up. All the spinning is making me dizzy.
