Originally Posted By jonvn In a rare moment of sanity, courts have ruled that you can't force people to take a drug test in a public job, unless that job involves safety of some kind. Maybe this drug fascism will come to an end someday. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/13/BA1FVJK4K.DTL" target="_blank">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/ article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/13/BA1FVJK4K.DTL</a>
Originally Posted By RoadTrip Oh great. There is absolutely nothing more frightening than a mis-shelved book. People will be wandering through the stacks for days trying to find the book they need. Some will give up. Others will continue their relentless search until they die of thirst or starvation. It will not be pretty.
Originally Posted By mele Is there some way we can blame the gays who have infiltrated the government for this?
Originally Posted By alexbook I enjoyed this reader comment: >>I used to work at the San Francisco Public Library when it was still at 200 Larkin Street, where the Asian Art Museum is now. And boy oh boy, let me tell you--the majority of the staff was higher than the sky on any given day, and they still could find a book or two if pressed to the task. Drugs idn't seem to phase their work performance, it was pretty spotty either way.<< Seriously, though, I've never understood how anybody can justify random drug testing legally, especially for jobs that don't involve public safety.