Midwest crop damage not as bad as feared

Discussion in 'World Events' started by See Post, Jun 30, 2008.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By RoadTrip

    Midwest crop damage not as bad as feared.

    Source: <a href="http://www.startribune.com/business/22742514.html?location_refer=Homepage:highlightModules:1" target="_blank">http://www.startribune.com/bus...odules:1</a>

    Well there is a big effin surprise if I ever heard one. Another case of the media trying to panic folks and our gullible population accepting the B.S. as truth.

    Man, no wonder Dubya has been able to pull his shenanigans for the past eight years. Apparently the average American is dumb as a rock!
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By dshyates

    So it appears that yes the damage amount was correct. It just a fortunate accident that the farmers planted more corn than was reported originally in March.
    So we were just to assume that the amount of corn reported to have been planted was underestimated and that the floods damage wasn't a big deal because we .....didn't know about..... the extra corn not reported..........in march was waiting in the wings to save us. Yeah that is what we should have assumed when we are watching our food supply wash away.
     

Share This Page