The Cost of the Iraq War

Discussion in 'World Events' started by See Post, Jan 5, 2007.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ecdc

    Hardball's David Shuster did a report on today's show on the cost of the Iraq war. It's about 250 million a day. He did an interesting comparison to other things Americans want or need.

    Cost of 6,000 more border agents and more border security for one year: 1.4 billion, or 6 days in Iraq.

    Cost to screen *all* baggage that goes through every American airport: 1 billion, or 4 days in Iraq.

    Cost to innoculate every single American child: 4 billion, or 16 days in Iraq.

    It isn't worth it, not by a longshot.

    Here's the link, then click on Watch Video.
    <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30
    36697/</a>
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By davewasbaloo

    Yep - that could feed the majority of the worl's population. Provide medical care to americans. Think about the improvements that could be made to education - that could actually fund a number of University Courses.

    War is not cheap, it's big business.
     
  3. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    Where's the benefit to us, the people that are footing this ridiculous bill?
     
  4. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By davewasbaloo

    At the risk of trivialising this, the US could have build Tokyo Disney Sea in 12 days!
     
  5. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By melekalikimaka

    This would be a prime example of why I despise politicians so much.
     
  6. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    Some more than others. It's not many "politicians" that would have led us into this debacle.
     
  7. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By melekalikimaka

    No, I'm going to blame the democrats who voted for this war too. (Most of them voted yes.) I don't care what their motivations are. They are just as responsible as the republicans who voted for it.
     
  8. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    But not as responsible as the republicans who actually led us into it. The 'yes men' aren't at the front of the parade.
     
  9. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By melekalikimaka

    True, I guess, but it's a long-ass parade and lots of blame for everyone involved. LOL
     
  10. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

    How much did it cost not to do anything about Bin Laden in the 90's? How much did it cost not invade Iraq?
     
  11. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By mrichmondj

    << How much did it cost not to do anything about Bin Laden in the 90's? How much did it cost not invade Iraq? >>

    Not even relevant to the current situation we are in now when there were countless other options that could have been pursued at far less of a cost.

    How much would the cost be to transform our energy policy so that we don't have to worry about Middle East security?

    How much would the cost be to lift opressed nations out of poverty so that they don't feel compelled to follow the Bin Ladens of the world?
     
  12. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    >> How much did it cost not to do anything about Bin Laden in the 90's? <<

    About the same as it costs us to not do anything about him in the 2000s.


    >> How much did it cost not invade Iraq? <<

    TO "not invade iraq? You mean in the first gulf war? Or during clinton's administration? I don't understand the question.
     
  13. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

    <Not even relevant to the current situation we are in now when there were countless other options that could have been pursued at far less of a cost.>

    I disagree.

    And as far as your questions, I think both would cost a lot more than what our liberation of Iraq has cost.
     
  14. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    Liberated? Is that you call this?
     
  15. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

    <About the same as it costs us to not do anything about him in the 2000s.>

    I think it cost much more. Not doing anything about him in the 1990's cost us 3000 lives and caused a recession to deepen.

    <TO "not invade iraq? You mean in the first gulf war? Or during clinton's administration? I don't understand the question.>

    There were costs involved in "containing" Saddam.
     
  16. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

    <Liberated? Is that you call this?>

    Yes.
     
  17. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By jonvn

    liberated from being alive, in a lot of cases.
     
  18. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

    Saddam "liberated" a lot more, if that's your definition.
     
  19. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By gadzuux

    >> Not doing anything about him in the 1990's cost us 3000 lives and caused a recession to deepen. <<

    So then it's hard to guesstimate what it's going to cost us due to our failure to apprehend him over the past six years.

    It's a safe bet that he's cookin' on something big too. And we're over here in iraq, bogged down in a competely unrelated "humanitarian gesture", if I've got the current talking points right.
     
  20. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By jonvn

    Yes, Saddam was a freedom fighter.
     

Share This Page