Originally Posted By Elderp 190,000 unaccounted for AK-47s. It is bad enough we are budgeting this war at a tune of about 10 billion per month but do we have to arm both sides? If so I think I should at least get my own AK-47 too, what makes them so special? <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20137021/site/newsweek/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20 137021/site/newsweek/</a>
Originally Posted By trekkeruss Them as in the Iraqi's, or the weapon? The weapon is special because of its durability; the AK-47 works, clean or not.
Originally Posted By sherrytodd I say we arm the Iraqi Security forces with slingshots. Once they prove they're responsible enough to handle those and won't just give them to the insurgents, then they can move up to BB guns. If they can manage that without shooting their eye out, then we'll talk bow and arrow. But if I hear about just one insurgent slingshot attack, then they're cut off completely.
Originally Posted By fkurucz <<What company makes AK-47s? I need to buy some stock in them.>> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A K-47</a>
Originally Posted By DVC_dad ^ ^ Wow that's answering a question there ain't it? I never knew there was so much to know about one weapon.
