Originally Posted By Simba12 Alright, this is purely rumors, educated guesses, and speculation. I believe that DW may soon see the addition of Beastly Kingdom ,(or however they spell it), at Animal Kingdom. A Beverly Hills section may also be added to Disney's Hollywood Studios. - I came across some interesting domain names that Disney has recently registered. They sound like Midieval - Beastly Kingdom attractions. They have also registered names about Beverly Hills. These include separate shop names. Again, these are based on domain names and a few other sources. Has anyone else heard of such projects? I know that Beastly Kingdom rumors have been around for years, but have sort of ceased recently. And, I haven't read any rumors about Beverly Hills on any of the "trusted" Disney rumor sites. Does anyone have any info. about such attractions?
Originally Posted By Simba12 Oops, sorry guys, I couldn't get the message to work. Feel free to erase the twin thread.
Originally Posted By Tip Top Club Beastly Kingdomme has been on the back-burner since the park open, it was however, to the best of my knowledge, recently axed altogether. And with the mythological Yeti now residing over in Anandapur, you shouldn't be surprised. However I wouldn't be surprised to see many additions to DAK in the nearish future. Specifically the nighttime lantern parade i'm sure we've all heard rumblings about, but really the priority at that park seems to be to make it a full day park, versus being able to see it in less than a day. However I beleive the lovely folks at corporate would like to see how Everest directly affects attendance before moving forward with such plans. And considering that the park's two major E-Tickets are in Asia and Africa I wouldn't be surprised to see a land connecting Africa and Camp Minnie-Mickey themed to another continent (Austrailia? South America?). But As I said, I think that's still far enough in the future for us to worry about other things first. As for beverly hills...honestly I doubt it. With DHS the question here seems to be how to make this more cohesive. When they announced the name change, I remember something about how the new name reflects how the park has grown and changed since it's opening (Ie just GMR and Backlot tour) and let's face it GMR is basically MGM palooza. As I've been saying, and will continue to, all four parks need TLC, and with the big DCA project going on, I think we'll really only be able to see small changes for a while, and then get wowed as soon as the DCA project is done. I don't have any inside sources, it just doesn't seem sensible to me.... But then of course, when has sense ever played a role in american corporations?
Originally Posted By Tip Top Club I really wish we had an edit button...What I mean is, as Wahooskipper so elequently stated "Since when did common sense and reasoning play into any decisions at major American corporations?"
Originally Posted By FerretAfros Just out of curiosity, what kind of attractions might they put in a Beverly Hills themed area? Sure, the shopping would put every other theme park to shame, but there really isn't much past that in the real Beverly Hills. Maybe a plastic surgeon here and there, but it's mostly a place where people live, not where anything particularly exciting happens.
Originally Posted By Simba12 Reportedly, Joe Rhode has admitted to cast members that they are working on something Dragon related for DAK. The two domain names in question were Midieval Magic Quest, (which sounds like a John Lasseter interactive type ride), and Flyin' Scales and Fire. Just guessing, but this sounds like an attraction that might use the next generation of Soarin' technology with a dragon theme. - As for the Beverly Hills names, they were registered shortly after Disney's Hollywood Studios was registered. On another site, they thought that it could have something to do with the new theming. If these are real attractions, they may be part of a long term plan. They often register names of movies, etc., years before they are released.
Originally Posted By Simba12 Again, I'm just guessing, but I wonder if they might incorporate the trolly cars and limos that are going to DCA in a Beverly Hills section. They might have a big Hollywood themed attraction to anchor it. - Like, a haunted Beverly Hills mansion would make a cool E - ticket attraction. - Tower of Tower is more about The Twilight Zone than a haunted house.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 Some thoughts/answers: There will never be a BK section at DAK. That was told to me by a guy named Joe Rohde himself. I'm sure he has a bit of an idea about the future of the park since it has been his baby since the early 1990s when it was conceived. That doesn't mean you won't see mythical creatures and attractions based upon them. That is what EE and the yeti are all about. But the BK area as planned will go into history like Tony Baxter's Discovery Bay and, before that, Marc Davis's Thunder Mesa/Western River Expedition as major concepts that never made it. DAK will be getting a night-time parade called Rivers of Light (not on water despite the title). It's been approved and is being created by Steven Davison, one of the most talented folks in Disney theme park entertainment. I believe it will be debuting in 2009. As to Beverly Hills ... well, let's just say domains are registered for all sorts of reasons. If Disney did indeed register them it might have to do with anything from a movie, to a TV show, to attractions at DCA ... or even The Park About To Formerly Be Known As The Disney MGM Studios. I wouldn't read much into it ... yet.
Originally Posted By Simba12 Spirit of 76, you seem to know a lot about the Disney parks. Are you an Imagineer? If Joe Rhode told you there "will never be a Beastly Kingdom", when did he tell you it? Remember, this is a different Disney company than a few years ago. Old concepts may have been put back on the front burner. John Lasseter is suppose to have a lot more clout now within Imagineering. He answers only to Bob Iger. So, let's think positive, that's the true spirit of Disney.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 ^^It's Spirit of 74. My cousin is the Spirit of 76! No, I'm not an Imagineer. It is a fun job though. I know many (although some are ex-Imagineers). Joe told me a few years back, but he has restated this numerous times to mutual friends. The BK concept is dead. Yeah, it would have been kewl. But it's not happening. But, by the same token, moving the concept into things like Everest aren't exactly poor substitutes either. There will be more attractions featuring these creatures that 'never were' ... it just won't be that original conceived land. Don't worry, as long as Joe has creative control, that park is in great hands ... and, frankly, I think you'll have to pry his hands off it when he's dead many decades from now!
Originally Posted By Simba12 Off the subject a bit, has anyone heard when and if Disney may build major Narnia attraction(s) at Disney World? If so, where would they go? I originally thought that they would go in at Animal Kingdom, now I'm not sure. Dick Cook said that they were developing some for the parks when the first movie came out. - Also, how about Journey to the Center of the Earth from DisneySea? Will we ever see that at DW?
Originally Posted By land fan By the way , I thought that taking 20k out and replacing it with the Pooh playground was very insulting to the paying public while admission prices continued to skyrocket.Something big should have been on the drawing boards for that area long before the lagoon was drained and filled in with dirt.Fantasyland already has enough for the stroller crowd. It didn't need a Mc Donald's style playground!
Originally Posted By MPierce As Spirit of St Louis ( :_) ) already said domain names can be registered for many different reasons. You already want the rights registered so there is no conflict in the neear future. >> The BK concept is dead. Yeah, it would have been kewl. But it's not happening. << I know you got that from the man who definetly would know. However, I stiil believe that could be the best counter effect against HP over at Universal.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 <<Off the subject a bit, has anyone heard when and if Disney may build major Narnia attraction(s) at Disney World? If so, where would they go? >> The ideas most recently tossed around for Narnia involve Fantasyland's old lagoon area. But I don't believe it will happen. Narnia, while successful, doesn't resonate enough with most folks enough to spent $150-250 million for an attraction. << Also, how about Journey to the Center of the Earth from DisneySea? Will we ever see that at DW?>> Very doubtful. There was talk of adding it to DAK, basically where Mickey-Minnie is as a way of 'balancing' the park with Everest on one side of the ToL and Journey on the other. But I also don't see that happening. There's always going to be talk in a creative company like Disney, but much of it ends there ... or soon after.
Originally Posted By Tip Top Club I think that if there were ever a narnia attraction, they'd probably want to wait to see how Prince Caspian Does next year before putting it into serious consideration.
