Originally Posted By jdub Okayokayokay...I've got a great new name! Hope it's not already been suggested here. Now, I was originally thinking something simple, like "Mollie," or "Hoss," but let's not, alright? Let's go with something really ridiculous, pretentious--and trendy as all h*ck! Ya ready? "The Rides at Anaheim"
Originally Posted By crazycroc Don't change the name. With the new boss, {same as the old boss} we are going to end up with something even lamer like "Disney's Dream Park" or " Disney's IMAGInation Infestation Park", or "Disney's Adventure Magic". ::UKE::: At least we know the name now is no good, let's not see if they can up with something even worse. The glass is totally half full.
Originally Posted By ArchtMig ^^^Well, hopefully Jay Rasulo won't still be around when the decision comes down, because if he is and if he's in charge of making that decision, then we may very well end up with that sort of tripe.
Originally Posted By disneywatcher >> At least we know the name now is no good, let's not see if they can up with something even worse. << If that's the case, then the many goofs and miscues of DCA can never be eliminated because of fear that the current crop of executives, managers and Imagineers will be, or are, as incompetent as the former ones.
Originally Posted By bean CaliforniaLand to go with Hollywoodland Bearland Paradise pierland Bugsland CarLand
Originally Posted By ArchtMig bean, you forgot to mention Pacific Wharfland, and Giant Outtaplace Hotel-land.
Originally Posted By Nobody From way back in Post 15: Just got back from the weekend in Disneyland resort. When I went to retrieve my dog from my mother in law's house I mentioned I had visited California Adventure. She blinked a few times and said "Oh, is that new?" She has been to disneyland numerous times but not since the new park opened and had NEVER HEARD OF IT!!!" With all due respect, she IS just a dog.
Originally Posted By Route66 How about "Hyperion Studios Park" or "Walt's Hyperion Park" Prolly' been suggested already.
Originally Posted By SpokkerJones It can't be Walt Disney's California because it's not Walt Disney's. When films were released when Walt was alive they were called "Walt Disney's" Whatever. After he died it was "Walt Disney Productions" and then "Walt Disney Pictures Presents". Walt didn't have a hand in DCA. His personal name should not be used, only the company name or some variation of.
Originally Posted By Elderp Walt didn't have a hand in DCA?? As much as I think that place should still be a parking lot, if good ol' Walt hadn't bought that land in the first part it probably be some condo development right now.
