Originally Posted By mousermerf this is case-in-point why I often have nothing nice to say about the recent crop of Imagineers: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6gp9se" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/6gp9se</a> You may disagree but quality of character reflects in people's work, or so my experience in art and theater has taught me. Also, Design on a Dime? From Imagineering? Who'd of thunk it...
Originally Posted By NikkiLOVESMickey According to the article, this guy was an imagineer in 1995 and, apparently, no longer is one. What does his starting a porn company have to do with the current crop of imagineers? He's decided to peddle smut, so that means all imagineers are horrible people and thus are going to design horrible projects for Disney? I don't see the connection - it makes no sense! Give me a break.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 I have no idea what the point is here. The guy worked at WDI a decade ago. Hopefully, he did quality work. I'm not familiar with him. Who gives a damn what he is doing now so long as its legal (and thankfully the religious right hasn't outlawed porn and sex YET!) And you have no idea what some current Imagineers are into ... again, so long as it isn't illegal and doesn't affect their work, whose business is it?
