Ride Or Attraction??

Discussion in 'Walt Disney World News, Rumors and General Disc' started by See Post, Jun 27, 2006.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By pixiedust1

    Was it Walt Disney who coined the phrase attraction when it came to describing the parks (RIDES) and preferred to refer to them as attractions.. I always remember them as attractions in printed material and ads.. does anyone have any thoughts on this...
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ChiMike

    There are a number of Walt quotes in which he used the words "ride(s)"

    I'm pretty sure attractions was a term that came from the growth of Disney U/marketing. I think it was a good way to differeniate WDI's product compared to the rest of the amusement industry. I just am pretty sure Walt wasn't being yellin' at everyone saying "ITS AN ATTRACTION DARN IT"
     
  3. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ssWEDguy

    The word "attraction" says so much more.

    A ride is something you just go on. What you see is what you get.

    An attraction has a story line involved, and is more of an experience.
     
  4. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Labuda

    Plus, an attraction can include things like HoP, CoP, Country Bears, meeting the rubberheads in Toontown, and so on.
     
  5. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By danyoung

    But I feel strongly that an attraction can also be a ride. It ticks me off when people get all cranky and say "Hey, the Haunted Mansion isn't a ride - it's an attraction!" It's a moving vehicle, so it's a ride. Country Bear Jamboree was an attraction, but it wasn't a ride - no moving vehicle.

    Pet peeve, and no big deal, but as long as we were discussing it . . .
     
  6. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Labuda

    Makes perfect sense to me, Danny boy!
     
  7. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Disneymom443

    I think it depends on the CM... some get mad if you say ride and other don't mind. or if you say show and the CM tells you isn't not a show its a movie.
     
  8. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By Spirit of 74

    I know the nomenclature when I started going to WDW back in 19XX, that nothing was ever referred to as a ride.

    It was all attractions, shows or adventures. But I'm fairly certain it evolved over time and that old Uncle Walt himself used the term 'ride' plenty.
     
  9. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By FerretAfros

    What exactly makes it an "adventure"? I understand what rides and shows are, but I don't see what would make an adventure stand out. The only adventure that I can think of off hand is the Indiana Jones Adventure in DL, but that is only because adventure is in the name.

    With CM's saying that it is a movie, not a show, it is possible that they just want guests to have the proper expectaions. If I went in a building to see a live stage show, and saw a movie instead, I would be pretty dissapointed, but if I had been told that it was a movie ahead of time, I would have no problem with it.

    And one last question: Is the Carousel of Progress a ride or an attraction? (Strictly defining an attraction as something like CBJ, HOP, or the Tiki Room.)
     
  10. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By vbdad55

    to me it is an attraction -
     
  11. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By danyoung

    CofP is a tough one to pidgeonhole. It's a show, but the theater moves, so it's a ride, too.
     
  12. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By hopemax

    >There are a number of Walt quotes in which he used the words "ride(s)"

    I'm pretty sure attractions was a term that came from the growth of Disney U/marketing. I think it was a good way to differeniate WDI's product compared to the rest of the amusement industry. I just am pretty sure Walt wasn't being yellin' at everyone saying "ITS AN ATTRACTION DARN IT"

    I rememember reading somewhere, in one of the various history books, that they did call the rides, rides at first. But adults wouldn't ride a "ride," because of all the negative connotations from previous amusement park experiences. They would partake in an attraction though. So "attraction" is a Walt era term. I'm not sure exactly when the change in terminology occured. My Dad's 1956 guidebook says "Rides and Amusements", the 1960 one says "Attractions and Amusements." Unfortunately, the ones inbetween 1956 and 1960 are in storage so I can't check.

    I'm sure in interviews and such, attraction and ride were interchangable terms, but use of "attraction" in ticketing and such was a deliberate attempt to change the audience's preconceived ideas.
     
  13. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ChiMike

    >>And one last question: Is the Carousel of Progress a ride or an attraction? (Strictly defining an attraction as something like CBJ, HOP, or the Tiki Room.)<<

    Agree with others. Attractions, neither simply 'ride' nor 'show'

    >>So "attraction" is a Walt era term<<
    >>I'm sure in interviews and such, attraction and ride were interchangable terms, but use of "attraction" in ticketing and such was a deliberate attempt to change the audience's preconceived ideas.<<

    Hopemax you put it much better than I did. I agree, I just haven't seen anything saying that the change came from Walt himself. Even in 1965 he is using "ride" in common conversation.
     
  14. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By trekkeruss

    <<CofP is a tough one to pidgeonhole. It's a show, but the theater moves, so it's a ride, too.>>

    I'd call CoP an attraction (or a theater presentation.) I would not call it a ride. Even though the theater seating moves, it doesn't do so during the presentation, other than to move you to the next set. At least that's my take on it, no matter that the word Carousel is part of the name!
     
  15. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By danyoung

    ^^ trekkeruss, I agree with you. I was just pointing out that this one is a hard one to clasify.
     
  16. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By pixiedust1

    >>So "attraction" is a Walt era term<<
    >>I'm sure in interviews and such, attraction and ride were interchangable terms, but use of "attraction" in ticketing and such was a deliberate attempt to change the audience's preconceived ideas.<<

    Thank you ChiMike... I new that I read that somewhere, and for the life of me I've been searching for a quote, or someone to explain... I remember our first visits to Disney in the early 80's when saying RIDE was a no no... I knew that Walt had some part in it, even if only in a small way.. I think Disney Company pushed that feeling in their marketing with a ride is a ride , but a attraction is so much more...
     
  17. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By ChiMike

    Thanks, but it was Hopemax who summed it up well.
     
  18. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By FerretAfros

    I think that it is kind of funny that in the 50's the part of "Rides and Amusements" that put adults off was the rides. If you were to go to a children's park today (as DL was often viewed in that time period), you would see many adults enjoying the rides, but fe taking part in the amusements.
     
  19. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By pixiedust1

    Hopemax Thank you as well...
     
  20. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Originally Posted By demderedoseguys

    Are they "rides" or "attractions" ?

    Are we "customers" or are we "guests" ?

    Does it really matter as long as we have a good time when we visit ?
     

Share This Page