Originally Posted By skinnerbox Excellent article by Andrew Sullivan about Palin's book: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/andrew_sullivan/article6926728.ece" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t...6728.ece</a>
Originally Posted By mstaft Her book is no less politically focused and full of interpretations of the truth then any other politician, including our current president.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 Sure, most pols' books are at least somewhat self-serving. But interpretation of the truth is one thing. Downright untruths are another. Palin, for instance, claims to have been deeply involved with settling the Exxon Valdez case. The people who actually were involved have said she had essentially nothing to do with it. And various McCain staffers have said that she did plenty of--to quote Palin herself --" makin' stuff up."
Originally Posted By DAR When I read the title this is what I thought skinner was referring to: <a href="http://bestdamncreativewritingblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/palin1.jpg" target="_blank">http://bestdamncreativewriting...lin1.jpg</a>
