Originally Posted By DAR <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/15/news/la-pn-democrats-logo-20100916" target="_blank">http://articles.latimes.com/20...20100916</a> Like getting a new logo, good job.
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By DAR Maybe focusing on the election should be priority one instead of coming up with a new logo.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt Why not do both? An organization doesn't have to stop one thing to do another you know.
Originally Posted By plpeters70 I see we're back to having random topics criticizing lawmakers if they dare do anything other than focus full time on what DAR sees as "important issues". Fun, fun...
Originally Posted By hopemax I'm already annoyed. I know how this topic is going to go. It should be a no-brainer that different parts of an organization can focus on different things at the same time. In what world is the person responsible for graphic design, or website rollout the same person responsible for campaign strategy? But no, someone who claims to have left this part of LP, has to make this an issue.
Originally Posted By hopemax So DAR, just what should the person responsible for graphic design's top priority be?
Originally Posted By DAR And it was touted as a major announcement by the party, yeah I'm sure people who are jobless are more at ease knowing there's a new logo.
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder DAR, in another thread you said you were back in WE to have civil conversations. Then you start this thread. I'd say you've contradicted yourself.
Originally Posted By DAR I guess I'm wrong everyone seems to love it: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20100916/cm_theweek/207105_1" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/thewee...207105_1</a>
Originally Posted By DAR I'm being civil. I'm simply pointing out that this isn't really the smartest thing to do for the Democrats right now.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "I'm simply pointing out that this isn't really the smartest thing to do for the Democrats right now." You've yet to really state why you believe that. It's obvious that you are grasping at straws here. Do you work for Fox News?
Originally Posted By imadisneygal It's not the job of the graphic arts department to chart the course of the Democratic party, for crying out loud. Debuting a new logo is not inconsistent with leading the party.
Originally Posted By disneydad109 I wonder if they are attempting to give a easy to locate logo for the folks who would other wise not know what button to push or lever to pull. P T Barnum said it best.You got to use whatever works. The old K I S S style.
Originally Posted By hopemax Nor is the person responsible for running the website, touting a "big announcement." Remember, when ABC's promo department made a really big deal about the significance of Jack's tattoo on Lost? No one made a post about how Iger or even the head of ABC was focusing on the wrong thing. I assume, because everyone knew they weren't responsible for it.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>It's not the job of the graphic arts department to chart the course of the Democratic party, for crying out loud.<< But ironically, if they need a chart of the course, the graphic art department is where they'll get it. ; )
