"The Wild"---so it's come to this...

Discussion in 'Disney and Pixar Animated Films' started by See Post, Mar 13, 2006.

Random Thread
  1. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By ctdsnark

    ...Disney is ripping off Dreamworks.

    The unthinkable has finally happened.

    John Lassiter,now more than ever---DISNEY NEEDS YOU!!!!!
     
  2. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By FerretAfros

    I agree. I saw something for it on the cover of Disney Adventures Magazine, and I thought to myself, "Self, since when have they advertised for other companies movies...Wait! Disney made that?!" I later realized that they had advertised for Harry Potter, but still, my initial though was that it was another studio's cheap movie.
     
  3. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By DVC_dad

    You ignoramuses, Disney had Wild in development long before Madagascar was begun. Who is ripping off whom?

    It's just like Bug's Life and Antz beating it to the market!!!
     
  4. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By cstephens

    You know, it's possible to have a discussion without resorting to name-calling. Even if you have a good point, it detracts.



    /cs
     
  5. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By electra

    Im getting really tired of crude ironic "jokes" & pop culture references in these cgi films. I liked the original Ice Age, but I hate what Im hearing coming out of the mouths of the characters in the sequels. I dont recall the first film having as much of that, at least not to the point it annoyed me. Its the reason i didnt care much for Madagascar as well...If Wild Life cuts back on that garbage I could actually enjoy it more than the Dreamworks film. But nope, there's the burping koala...
     
  6. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By DVC_dad

    True. Sorry guys.
     
  7. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By Santa Monica

    This movie looks terrible.
     
  8. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By utahjosh

    First, Disney didn't make "The Wild." I think it's the same situation as "Vailant" - Disney is just realeasing it, and putting their name on it.

    My guess is that there were hoping to find another Pixar in case things went bad.
     
  9. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By ctdsnark

    Even if Disney did begin this before Dreamworks started Madagascar---which I find a little hard to accept---except for the long-delayed Cars,just about CGI feature coming out this year is about animals!!!
    Explore some OTHER ideas,willya??!!??

    Disney's non-Pixar CGI output so far---Chicken Little and themoviewhosetitleIveforgottenabouttheWWIIpigeons---makes me reiterate my ealier observation about how BADLY they need John Lassiter.
     
  10. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By DVC_dad

    Yes we need John Lassiter no doubt.
     
  11. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By t1lersm0m

    I feel the same way. this seems like a ripoff of Madagascar, and have no plans on seeing it. Maybe this movie was planned before Madagascar, but the similarities will make it hard to enjoy. (or maybe not, I'm sure my son will bug me to see it)
     
  12. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By FerretAfros

    With Antz and A Bug's Life, they had the same subject matter, but they had very different styles. Antz was angular and brown tones, while ABL was round and pastels. Just looking at them quickly, you could tell them apart. With the recent debacle, you have to look a little longer, and think about it. It isn't as clear that they are different things, making it seem even more like a rip off.
     
  13. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By Liberty Belle

    I agree, they seem far more similar than Antz and a Bug's Life to me.
     
  14. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By smeeeko

    Woody Allen isn't doing any voices is he? I avoided ANTZ for that reason.. I just don't get the Woody Allen thing.

    As it is I probably won't see The Wild.. I already got it confused with that movie about the caffinated squirrel what was that? See I forgot the name of it already.
     
  15. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By gurgitoy2

    Well, it seems that "Hoodwinked" had a caffinated squirrel, and Dreamworks' upcoming "Over the Hedge" also has a hyperactive squirrel. Combine that with "Ice Age" that has Scrat in it, and you've got way too many squirrels that need Ritalin!
     
  16. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By ctdsnark

    I've seen direct-to-video CGI---most of it from Japan and France---that illustrates what could be done with this medium,and Disney is giving us hyped-up,pop-culture-spouting,voiced-by-B-list-celebrities animals.I can only surmise what Walt is doing in his grave right now.
     
  17. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA

    Some studio needs to make the jump here. All the CGI stuff is essentially offshoots of 'Shrek' or 'Toy Story.'

    Why not something totally different?

    Like, what if each frame of animation were NOT done on a computer, but were drawn...BY HAND.

    By an artist using a piece of paper and a pencil.
     
  18. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By wahooskipper

    I like Antz. Please, don't hurt me.
     
  19. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By FerretAfros

    ^^Death be unto you. : )
     
  20. See Post

    See Post New Member

    Originally Posted By DDMAN26

    <<voiced-by-B-list-celebrities >>

    Ahem

    One of those "B" list celebrities is the great Jack Bauer, Jack Bauer is never on the "B" list, Jack Bauer is always first.
     

Share This Page