You Can Say That Again!

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Kar2oonman, Jul 19, 2016.

Random Thread
  1. Kar2oonman

    Kar2oonman Active Member

    Melania's RNC speech borrowed key passages from one given by Michelle Obama back in 2008 at the DNC. It's a shame, because Melania was wearing a lovely gown by that hot new fashion designer, Xerox.
     
    skinnerbox and mawnck like this.
  2. mawnck

    mawnck Well-Known Member

    Gee, now what sort of rotten son-of-a-guns in the Trump campaign would've embarrassed poor Melania in front of the entire country like that?

    In other news, here's a blind item for you: Which poor little rich kids finally got back at their wicked stepmother?
     
    skinnerbox, ecdc and Kar2oonman like this.
  3. Dabob2

    Dabob2 Well-Known Member

    And here I was thinking Melania just stole other people's husbands.

    :p:D:rolleyes:

    Too soon?
     
    skinnerbox, iamsally, ecdc and 2 others like this.
  4. mawnck

    mawnck Well-Known Member

    More info about the speechwriting process, accompanied by a side order of headdesking from professional speechwriters:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/20/us/politics/melania-trump-convention-speech.html

    BTW, did anyone notice the other piece of plagiarism in the speech? This is not a joke. The following was actually in it:

    "Donald has a deep and unbounding determination and a never-give-up attitude. I have seen him fight for years to get a project done – or even started – and he does not give up! If you want someone to fight for you and your country, I can assure you, he is the 'guy'. He will never, ever, give up. And, most importantly, he will never, ever, let you down. "

    Yep. We got Rick-rolled.
     
    skinnerbox likes this.
  5. FerretAfros

    FerretAfros Well-Known Member

  6. iamsally

    iamsally Well-Known Member

    What a circus. Latenight comedians are not going to have to write any material for the next 3 months. It is being provided for free!!
     
    FaMulan and skinnerbox like this.
  7. Dabob2

    Dabob2 Well-Known Member

    Okay. Who believes that this woman McIver, who previously had done no work for the campaign in over a year of campaigning, had as her first assignment the big hugely important Melania rollout speech?

    Note that as an employee of the Trump Organization, it would actually have been illegal for her to do this.

    That's assuming she actually did. As opposed to being someone who agreed to fall on her sword knowing she wouldn't get fired -- and possibly other restitution?

    And wouldn't SOMEONE in the campaign have known who helped MT with her speech? And it took them two days to come up with a name? Really?
     
    skinnerbox likes this.
  8. EdisYoda

    EdisYoda Member

    Yes, I call shenanigans!
     
    iamsally likes this.
  9. mawnck

    mawnck Well-Known Member

    Actually I do. She co-wrote several of Trump's books. And it isn't as if the campaign has exactly been forthcoming on the topic of the speechwriting. Plus, throwing out a professionally written speech by two top speechwriters in favor of an internal half-a$$ by the Trump team seems oh so Trumpish.

    Besides, since McIver is a Trump Organization employee (writing her confession on a Trump Organization letterhead), they're now on the hook for violating campaign finance law. Your next President, ladies and gentlemens.
     
  10. Dabob2

    Dabob2 Well-Known Member

    The incompetence, both the speech itself and the way, the aftermath was handled, is very Trump for sure.

    It just seems awfully convenient that someone so low in the campaign (actually not on the campaign staff at all) should be the one to take the fall for it. And then not actually even take a fall.
     
  11. Dabob2

    Dabob2 Well-Known Member

    But I have to say that I love love love the fact that all that anyone outside the convention hall was talking about for the past two days was this plagiarism.
     
  12. mawnck

    mawnck Well-Known Member

    Which is astonishing. It was a 3-hour news story, but by harping on it, they campaign stretched it out to three days. They really are idjits. Putin would play that knucklehead like a fiddle.

    I bet they spend the next four months arguing about whether Cruz went off his script or not. (He didn't.) Starting with Trump, who will make it the primary topic of his acceptance speech.
     
    skinnerbox likes this.
  13. skinnerbox

    skinnerbox Member

    There are soooooooo many reasons not to want Drumpf in the White House. But this right here is the main one.

    Our nation would be steamrolled by less powerful countries if that idiot was POTUS. And given his history of overreactionary behavior, giving him access to the nuclear codes would be an effn disaster! :eek:
     

Share This Page