Originally Posted By t1lersm0m I'm so glad I saw this thread! I have to vote, I have to vote! I vote for Dole Whips. My vote is for Dole Whips. I love Dole Whips. Death to all other snacks. Including popcorn and churros. I love Dole Whips. (that should count as 4 votes for Dole Whips LOL)
Originally Posted By Deogges Mom The thread is sticking. Does that mean I can cast another vote for POPCORN?
Originally Posted By DlandDug Present total (not official, I hasten to add): Skewers: 11 Popcorn*: 8 Dole Whips: 7 churros*: 6 Turkey Legs*: 2
Originally Posted By mrichmondj My, my. Looks like the rise and fall of the Churroian and Popcornian Empires! Will the Dole Whippians herald in a new age of enlightened snacking for the world?
Originally Posted By AladdinAZ (As king of Adventureland Churroian Empire, I am still holding out hope for Churro's, but am pleasantly suprised by support for two "snacks" exclusive to Adventureland, Dole Whip and Skewers. p.s. churro's with a Dole Whip! the perfect taste sensation!)
Originally Posted By MissCandice I think skewers followed by a Dole Whip would make a lovely meal. As far as snacks, I vote CHURRO!
Originally Posted By cmpaley As Supreme Pontiff and Emperor of the Most Holy Churro, We hereby challenge the votes of posters who have created accounts after March 24, 2006. We also challenge the votes of posters who have less than 10 posts to their account. A list of the votes We challenge will be forthcoming.
Originally Posted By cmpaley The list of votes challenged by Us is as follows: Post 27, a vote for Skewers by Mr Mullett. We challenge this vote as the poster only has three (3) posts since creating their account on July 29, 2003. Post 42, a vote for Dole Whips by CrazyTrain. We challenge this vote as the poster only has (5) posts since creating their account on January 19, 2005. Post 48, a vote for Popcorn by Macncheese. We challenge this vote as the poster only has one (1) post and created their account today. Post 49, a vote for Churros by Sheep. We challenge this vote as the poster have only one (1) post and created their account today. Please note that these challenges will not affect the outcome but are made to ensure that the will of the participants of the LP community is reflected. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Christopher, PMIC
Originally Posted By chickendumpling Mr. Mullett has such a funny name I think he's vote should count. Besides, he voted for skewers so I like him. Besides that, so what if he's only posted thrice since 2003. Maybe he's shy.
Originally Posted By JBStew I vote for skewers. Please note I am using my previous screenname to place this vote, just in case anyone with too much time on their churro sticky hands decides to challenge my vote under the screen name DlandJB because I've only been using that screen name since I got married. Harumpf.
Originally Posted By wendebird >>Post 27, a vote for Skewers by Mr Mullett. We challenge this vote as the poster only has three (3) posts since creating their account on July 29, 2003.<< I personally know this poster. He has had many other posts, but when LP had an archive, he lost many of his post counts. (I lost more than 5,000 posts myself!) So how can you judge by how many posts a person has? If even myself has lost THAT many? FWIW, Mr Mullet is my husband & he did post for a while & now only pops in here & there. Mostly for the Snackies.
Originally Posted By DlandDug May I add that I have met Mr. Mullett on more than one occassion and can vouch for his existence as a bona fide poster. There has never been a requirement that any vote be disqualified on the basis of post count. I agree that this would be a valid way of identifying bogus votes. But, for this election, I cannot agree that it be retroactively employed. There has always been, of course, a requirement that all posters be registered within a specific period of time. Therefore, a few votes in this election shall, indeed, be disqualified.
