Originally Posted By cmpaley There is now...2 terms. OF course, Bush's apparent blatant disregard for the Constitution won't stop him if he really wants to take complete power.
Originally Posted By avromark So who's running for the Republicans? I thought there was a 2 term limit, we don't have a limit.
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<OF course, Bush's apparent blatant disregard for the Constitution won't stop him if he really wants to take complete power.>> The Bush Administration already talked once about canceling elections due to the threat of terrorism. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if he found some reason to do it in 2008. I think we've seen that Bush has no qualms when it comes to grabbing power.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 ^^^^^^^^^^^ at least it's the only thing he grabbed while in the White House Cigar anyone ?
Originally Posted By vbdad55 And no it didn't bother me as much as some others, but if we going to be ludicrous, let's do it from both sides of the Pol fence
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<And no it didn't bother me as much as some others, but if we going to be ludicrous, let's do it from both sides of the Pol fence>> I hope it's ludicrous, but you never know. I voted for Bush in 2004, but I've been pretty shocked over how broadly he is defining presidential power. Slick grabbing interns threatened nothing but his marriage. I think Bush grabbing power is a little more dangerous.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 Doesn't want to make me nominate either for man of the year-- is more my point. Bush will be out in 2 years and we'll all have someone new to bash...regardless of party affiliation. Also a more dangerous time in the world the last 4 years...and getting more dangerous by the minute --
Originally Posted By RokNRollaCosta "what credentials do you have, to so vociferously and adamantly be so captious of our President?" I never knew it took certain credentials to criticize the government. I thought, and correct me if I am wrong, that I had the freedom to critique a president whos' agenda, foreign policy, and executive decisions do not necessarily seem intelligent to me. Would anyone be interested in my resume?
Originally Posted By Beaumandy <<When it comes to actual combat experience and performance, Bush couldn't hold Kerry's jock, and he must embarrass his father, a true war hero.>> This is laughable when you consider the hate VietNam vets have for Kerry because he ran from combat, came home to trash his fellow soldiers who were still fighting in Vietnam. Remeber him lying about Christmans in Cambodia or the fake medals he threw over the White House fence? So Bush only served in the National Guard. I guess acording to you that's for losers. But trashing your fellow soldiers and helping the enemy win the war like Kerry did is heroic and so awesome nobody can carry his jock. Well, if you really felt that way, you should have voted for Kerry not Bush in 2004.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy <<OF course, Bush's apparent blatant disregard for the Constitution won't stop him if he really wants to take complete power.>> Quick, hide from the black helicopters!!
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By ADMIN <font color="#FF0000">Message removed by an administrator. <a href="MsgBoard-Rules.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the LaughingPlace.com Community Standards.</font>
Originally Posted By cape cod joe 55---This is great! NO names but for the first time---------I am reading posts with rational thought processes. I read your posts, and, although I don't agree with everything, I don't feel that neurological chalk board scratching feeling in my id as with so many other posts. I'm only quickly posting this indigenously because now maybe someone here will find me "discernible"?
