A Major Scientist changed mind re Global Warming

Originally Posted By jonvn

No. I'm not going to play your nonsense game.

State your reasonings. I do it frequently, as does everyone else here.

You can't do it, because your arguments are based on nothing but falsehood.

You come up with excuse after excuse after excuse, like a weak minded 12 year old who doesn't want to do his homework.

You have no truth. If you did, and I was so very wrong as you assert, you could EASILY show me to be wrong.

You don't. That is all that needs to be understood.

 

Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

<If you did, and I was so very wrong as you assert, you could EASILY show me to be wrong.>

I have. You just can't admit it.

 

Originally Posted By jonvn

Showing me to be incorrect on the topic would actually require you to have done so.

Since you claim you have, yet have not, you are again simply lying.

And the truth is there is no reason to do so. Again, if I'm wrong, point out some information regarding the topic that shows me to be wrong.

You still are not, because you still can not. And to claim otherwise, is again, lying on your part. Flat out mendacity and prevarication.

It comes down to you simply being a liar. Yet again.

 

Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

<Again, if I'm wrong, point out some information regarding the topic that shows me to be wrong.>

Again, I've done that. You made an insupportable assertion. I pointed that out, and you responded with personal attacks.

<It comes down to you simply being a liar.>

No, it doesn't. The liar is the one who makes the baseless assertions and accusations, not the one who denies them.

 

Originally Posted By jonvn

"Again, I've done that."

Again, you are flat out lying.

So who cares what you have to say at this point. You refuse to provide any backing for your comments, yet you claim you have, so you're a liar.

That simple.

 

Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

<Again, you are flat out lying.>

No, I'm not.

<So who cares what you have to say at this point.>

Apparently you do. Evidently, I threaten your world view, and expose you as a fraud. At least, that's the best reason I can think of for your continued, meritless attacks.

<You refuse to provide any backing for your comments, yet you claim you have, so you're a liar.>

One of us is, but it's not me.

 

Originally Posted By vbdad55

getting the feeling I am watching a tennis match....

 

Originally Posted By Dabob2

<<And at least one of us showed how you mischaracterized what that article said.>>

<No, I'm positive you did not.>

Actually, I don't think it WAS me. I think I was going to, then someone else beat me to it.

 

Originally Posted By jmoore1966

RE: 423. Yeah, and a repeat at that.

 

Originally Posted By jonvn

well, it's my fault. It's easy to get caught up in that nonsense. I need to remember my own advice on the subject.

 

Originally Posted By DouglasDubh

<I think I was going to, then someone else beat me to it.>

No one did.

 

Originally Posted By Dabob2

<<I think I was going to, then someone else beat me to it.>>

<No one did.>

No, someone must have, because your mischaracterization was shown to be what it was.