Originally Posted By davewasbaloo Funny, I would like more DAK and Epcot and less MK and DHS. But I would never refuse a chance to Kungaloosh, no matter where on property.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>ITTBAB, Chester and Hesters, Lion King Celebration, Finding Nemo Musical... none of those are whimsical or fantasy?<<< Beyond that. Those just seem to exist in lands that are dedicated to realism. A whole land, (BK!!!) would do that. MysI, too.
Originally Posted By CaptainMichael <<<ITTBAB, Chester and Hesters, Lion King Celebration, Finding Nemo Musical... none of those are whimsical or fantasy?>>> You lost me at Chester and Hester.
Originally Posted By SeventyOne >>>ITTBAB, Chester and Hesters, Lion King Celebration, Finding Nemo Musical... none of those are whimsical or fantasy?<<< A Bug's Life is the odd man out here, tho I tend to forget it's in the park. But Lion King and Nemo both present animals that behave fairly realistically--no clothes, no walking on two legs, they actually eat one another. Pochiantas fit this mold, as well, arguably the most realistic Disney cartoon animals in years. And to pile on Chester & Hester, it's themed to a real-world run-down traveling carnival--not some gleaming idealized version of Coney Island, which would probably have been the case had a similar concept been built in MK. <shudders at the possibility> The rumor at issue specifically said a "land." What kind of land does the Club fit?
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Something like the Port of Entry at IoA, springs RIGHT to mind...
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper Crap in one hand, wish in the other. See what one fills up first. That's all I gotta say about that.
Originally Posted By CaptainMichael <<< The rumor at issue specifically said a "land." What kind of land does the Club fit?>>> Pleasure Island...oh wait er Mystic Point...oy um Yeah, what EE said, something like Port of Entry.
Originally Posted By FerretAfros Where would something like that go in the park, physically? I imagine they would be able to make it a pretty big draw, but I don't know how they would be able to work it in with the existing lands. I can see them trying to put it over near Camp Minnie Mickey, but I don't know if they would be able to attract the adult crowds over there, since AC doesn't really seem like a child-friendly concept. They may enjoy it, but it seems like there's more to it than that.
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 ^^Why? People go to WDW to meet characters. ~Wanna hug a foamhead?~
Originally Posted By wahooskipper If you take a look at Google Earth you will be surprised to see how much land they have to work with at DAK. Heck, I know that property pretty well and I was even impressed with the space availability.
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo DAK is 500 acres - double the size of the MK and larger than Epcot.
Originally Posted By wahooskipper Yeah, I think people focus on the Safari ride but if you look east of the "railroad" tracks there is quite a bit of land for future projects. Actually, looking at Google Earth I was also surprise with the pockets of land that are still available around the Magic Kingdom.
Originally Posted By CaptainMichael Actually, if you look at google earth, the CMM plot is perfect; especially, if you want the Adventurers Club accessible at night. ~after all, it was supposed to be "temporary"~
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>^^Why? People go to WDW to meet characters.<<<< They could move them. Would be ironic to see M/Gs moved for a new land in DAK while MK is getting a land just FOR M/Gs...Would balance that equation out. >>>Nearly 10 times the size of Disneyland<<< The entire size of Universal Orlando.
Originally Posted By Anatole69 Someone please tell me what CMM stands for. I am lost on the jargon. - Anatole
