Originally Posted By dshyates Is every/anyone else getting the error page every time it flips to a new page on ANY topic?
Originally Posted By mawnck >>Is every/anyone else getting the error page every time it flips to a new page on ANY topic?<< Yes. It's been doing that for awhile.
Originally Posted By utahjosh A business decision is a business decision is a business decision. The headline of this thread is misleading if not an outright LIE.
Originally Posted By ecdc It is misleading. It is not a lie. Miller has banned the movie in his theaters. His theater are in Utah. But Josh, plenty of us have commented on Miller's right to show what he wants at his privately owned business. Do you care to comment on the hypocrisy we've brought up? You don't have to circle the wagons every time someone in Utah does something, you know.
Originally Posted By mawnck >>It is misleading. It is not a lie.<< It's not a lie. It's a LIE. All caps. Semantic argument only. And I'm on Josh's side with this one. I never watch Desperate Housewives, but it would be silly to say I've banned the show from my house.
Originally Posted By EighthDwarf It got you to read the thread though, didn't it? ;-) The facts are detailed in Post #1.
Originally Posted By jdub >>Is every/anyone else getting the error page every time it flips to a new page on ANY topic?<< Yes, I have been, I think all week long.
Originally Posted By mele Aren't there a lot of people/businesses that are up in arms about the title of this movie? I used to be a big Kevin Smith fan but kinda lost interest around the "Jersey Girl/Gigli" era. (I know "Gigli" isn't a KS movie but they're connected by the whole "Bennifer" fiasco.)
Originally Posted By mele Something about Elizabeth Banks kind of bugs me. Not sure what it is. I haven't seen any Seth Rogan movies, either. I guess I'm just not that hip anymore. (If I ever was.)
Originally Posted By DAR <<Something about Elizabeth Banks kind of bugs me.>> Nothing about Elizabeth Banks kind of bugs me.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <I noticed that the TV ads a week or so ago called the film "Zack and Mimi Make a Porno" but now the movie is billed in the ads as simply "Zack and Mimi."> This also happened years ago with the movie "Sami and Rosie Get Laid." If you're not familiar, it was an indie Brit comedy that probably didn't play beyond the art houses (and AFAIK was never advertised on US TV), but even here in NY the print ads had the "get laid" excised from them.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan I wonder if movie makers ever think about the fact that people have to walk up to the box office window and say the names of these movies out loud? I'm not a total prude, but I'd feel more comfortable not asking the 16 year old ticket seller for 2 tickets to a movie with "porno" or "get laid" in the title.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 Can't you just say "Two for Sami and Rosie?" Most people shorten the titles when asking for movie tix all the time. How many people do you think really asked for "Two for Pirates of the Caribbean Three: At World's End" as opposed to "Two for Pirates."
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan I asked for 2 tickets to POTC3:AWE, and the box office person just stared blankly at me. That's what happens from hanging out at Laughing Place.
Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder "The headline of this thread is misleading if not an outright LIE." You certainly are the expert there.
Originally Posted By Mr X ***A business decision is a business decision is a business decision.*** No, I don't think so. Some business people make decisions contrary to their best interests (such as this one) for personal purposes (such as religion). All I can say is, I'm glad I don't live in Utah (not that I care about seeing this particular movie, in any case, but I prefer to have my personal freedoms unimpinged thanks). ***The headline of this thread is misleading if not an outright LIE.*** Who cares? Why are you so threatened by it? Obviously it bothers you a great deal, you even started some other thread to make fun of it. Why?
