Originally Posted By woody >>We'll see what happens in November.<< This proves what? That Liberal can argue? That is really besides the point. The public is clearly wary of the Republicans, but for different reasons. The last line is obviously doesn't connect with the rest of your post. Quite revealing of your arguing abilities.
Originally Posted By jonvn "This is non-responsive. You just made an assertion without even defending your assertion." Because after 150 posts on the topic, there is no further need. "I read Beaumandy numerous times. He does make good points." I'll take a play from the page of one of the conservative posters here: No he doesn't. "You have to prove your assertion that he is incapable of making an argument." He has already done this for me.
Originally Posted By jonvn "This proves what? That Liberal can argue?" If you were capable of following what I had said in the post, you'd know what it was in reference to, and what it meant. Since you don't seem able to follow what was said the first time, I really see little reason to repeat.
Originally Posted By woody Yes, don't repeat. There is no further need. You prove you only make assertions.
Originally Posted By jonvn I post facts all the time. If they're not understood, it's not my problem. In any case, at least you don't feel the need to have me repeat. Perhaps you can at least get the point from what is said the first time, whether you like what is said or not. That puts you a cut above, you know.
Originally Posted By woody It is funny how you change on a dime. You asserted that Beaumandy can't make an argument and only say his posts prove your point. That's a bit odd. It does require some more effort than that. I'm not asking you to repeat. Whats the use? You never proved anything based on your arguments because you had none. There wasn't anything substantive coming from you, only assertions. You have nothing to repeat.
Originally Posted By jonvn "You asserted that Beaumandy can't make an argument and only say his posts prove your point." Yep. That's right. Thanks for listening. "It does require some more effort than that." I've already pointed out the reasons why I said that. "You never proved anything based on your arguments because you had none." Actually, I did, but you're ignoring them. I understand. It's more convenient that way. If you want to know what they are, you can read through the thread. Have a good evening, Woody.
Originally Posted By woody "I've already pointed out the reasons why I said that." HINT: NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
Originally Posted By jonvn HINT: I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU THINK IS GOOD ENOUGH. IT'S ALREADY BEEN POSTED. GO FIGURE IT OUT.
Originally Posted By woody >>IT'S ALREADY BEEN POSTED.<< Which post between 1 through 160? >>GO FIGURE IT OUT.<< Great, I don't even believe you know. Otherwise, you would have pointed it out to me already.
Originally Posted By jonvn "Which post between 1 through 160?" Tell you what: Read them all, summarize them in an email, and if you have further questions, ask me then. "you would have pointed it out to me already." Actually, what it is, Woody, is that I've grown a bit tired of repeating myself for the rightwingers here. So I really don't anymore. Not as much, anyway.
Originally Posted By woody I'm asking you now. That means now. I'm sure you don't want to repeat yourself. That's why I'm asking you for the post where you proved your argument about Beaumandy. It is actually quite easy. In the future, just link to your insightful post. The handy dandy Jonvn brilliant response to all things Conservatives.
Originally Posted By jonvn "I'm asking you now. That means now." Demanding, aren't you. In any case, you've gotten your answer, now. "In the future, just link to your insightful post." In the future, just read the topic before you decide to go popping off on it and demanding that people cater to your inability to do your own homework.
Originally Posted By woody I got my answer. Your answer is you have nothing to offer. You have absolutely no posts that prove your point. You keep saying you're tired of repeating yourself. That's because you just keep making the same assertions over and over again. In this thread, only Dabob2 made any attempt at arguing with Beaumandy on the basis of facts. So you're just an empty suit. You're full of assertions. You're not repeating yourself in making arguments on facts. I've just done my homework. You fail the test.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy Woody, you proved my point with this guy. He is the master of telling the world that he has already answered the question, yet, he never answered anything in the first place. THEN, he tells us we are to ignorant because we don't get what he is saying! He did this exact thing in his first thread back a few months ago when we called him out for calling a story garbage. We asked him why the story was garbage even though the story was factual. That is where his spinning and the I " told you why " nonsense started. It's like dealing with freaking Rainman. jon, are you also and excellent driver? Do you get your underwear at K-Mart? Are there big cards left in the deck? Dabob is one person on here who will actually give you an honest debate from the left regardless of how confused he might be.
Originally Posted By jonvn "I got my answer. Your answer is you have nothing to offer." Actually, woody, there have been a bunch of posts on this thread about it. If you can't be bothered to read them, that's your problem. And this again goes to prove my point. Another one of the right wing posters whose trolley doesn't quite go to the top of the hill. They simply have no arguments, just a lot of hostile noise, and demands that the same information be presented over and over and over again. It's a very weird thing. I don't see anyone else doing it, either. Like a living Bob and Ray routine.
Originally Posted By Shooba How about this recent post Woody: <<The piece is about "Death of a President," a British film that depicts the assassination of George Bush and its aftermath.>> This is the left in all their glory. They lose elections so they are now down to a fantasy where they kill Bush. Pretty sick but not surprising with these people.
Originally Posted By Shooba That's right, there's a British fiction project about the assasination of Bush. To the dim-witted amongst us, this can be used to assign an opinion to people who have nothing to do with the project.
Originally Posted By jonvn Oh, hey, how about the 17,000 scientist thing with the global warming? Like, every single independent organization that studies the situation all basically say the same thing. But this person comes up with this one organization with ties to big corporations that says otherwise, so all that goes out the window. Then he comes up with some petition with who knows what people on it, and that somehow invalidates all the rest of it, too. It's base stupidity. I mean, it's as if everything is either black or white, with no idea of what context something is in, or anything. It's all just one big monolith of ignorance. Look at this topic. Instead of pointing out examples as to why I'm wrong, all they can come up with is calling me names. It's beyond pathetic. But it is the same thing they did when they didn't like what Michael Moore had to say. Instead of pointing out the errors in his facts, they started calling him fat. It seems to me that the public, at this point in time, has gotten tired of it. Also tired of the basic impossibility of people who "think" like this to govern. They've made a mess of things. All they have left is calling us marxists and pansies.
Originally Posted By jonvn "To the dim-witted amongst us, this can be used to assign an opinion to people who have nothing to do with the project." It's like that on every single issue. Instead of attacking the thing as an example of bad taste, and talking about how people in other countries view us, and whether or not that is a common viewpoint, we get that same junk, because that's all they know how to say.
