Originally Posted By BeautysBeast You just said the magic word for the little lambs..Lawyer father...
Originally Posted By trekkeruss <<Lets hope they do sue and win ..they certainly have a case against disney.>> I'm not so sure about having such a clear-cut case, and because of that, I'd rather not see this taken to court; there are a lot bigger fish to fry than this minor incident.
Originally Posted By dshyates "Unless the lawyer father of the one teen decides to persue a discriminatory charge, there will be no need for Disney to settle anything." My guess is we would have never heard about this unless this was in the future. And Disney reducing the ban was a bad first step in acknowledging guilt.
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast if your these kids fathers lawyer your drooling at the idea of punitive damages..no?
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast Most the posters on here as on anywhere on internets have preconceived ideas of their own justice and its just misguided...
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast blue ohana terror ..per ur post #76 where in the blue blazez did i mention anything bout princess and the frog?? I dont remeber it,and what special studio priveledge did u get too see it ..huh huh huh???? didnt think so...keep your personal comments to yourself they do no good to anyone...
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast being the first black princess i feel is being exploitative..im entitled to my opinion ...step away from your keyboard if u cant deal...sabe??
Originally Posted By BlueOhanaTerror >>>So I guess sarcasm should still be considered sarcasm, even when it comes from a place of ignorance, irrelevance, and ineffectuality...<<< >>>Thats a pointless statement when arguing about sarcasm because its rooted in the politics of todays worldview.2 sides to every argument.And to make your side of an argument by name calling seems to indicate you have nothing intelligent to add.<<< No name calling involved here, just an observation on your own tenor, education and level of communicative ability, which you've done nothing but support since. You've actually been to college? Wow. Your English professors should be horsewhipped.
Originally Posted By BlueOhanaTerror I was about to answer the first part of your question, Beauty, when you answered it for me in your very next post (# 190). Your remarks under another posting name notwithstanding, are consistent with your combative and presumptive style here. As to how I know about the material in the film itself, I have the script. That's the "special studio priveledge" (sic) that I enjoy, which in this case, was just a lucky fluke.
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast your misinformed and i feel sorry ..there is medication u can take ..just ask your local doctor...
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast aagain stepaway from the computer..you need to take a break ..plenty of stories of folks like you going nutso and harming others..please do yourself the favor and get help ok??
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast i checked the archives and beloved classic is the person u got a beef with...just stay the hell away from me
Originally Posted By trekkeruss I'm not BlueOhana, but I don't quite understand why you feel Disney depeicting a black princess is exploitive. I am Chinese (American) and I didn't feel like Disney was being exploitive when they depicted an Chinese princess.
Originally Posted By BeautysBeast this blue ohana thinks it knows me and what took disney so long to african princess?
