Originally Posted By dshyates I have to admit that I will visit FL more to take pictures during the construction progress than I will after the section opens to actually ride the rides. I am not really interested in anything they are building. But I do agree on Potter. Sometimes I have even been seen there without a camera (Gasp).
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>Snow White Scary Adventures is not a good ride.<<< Because of the condition it is in. Fix it up. Bring it into the 21st century, like DL, and we wouldn't be having this discussion. It's on the same scale as Peter Pan, and everyone loves that...
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<It's on the same scale as Peter Pan, and everyone loves that... >> Pan isn't a good ride either, but it's got a much more interesting layout and potential. It really has nothing to do with the condition it's in.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>It really has nothing to do with the condition it's in.<<< If it was in flawless condition, had working effects, a good sound system, and working AAs, I seriously doubt you'd be saying that. Essentially, what it is in Disneyland.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<If it was in flawless condition, had working effects, a good sound system, and working AAs, I seriously doubt you'd be saying that.>> There's barely any AAs in it. It's mostly plywood sets and static figures. It sucks haha
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>There's barely any AAs in it. It's mostly plywood sets and static figures.<<< And that's what is in need of it being brought up to date.
Originally Posted By HMButler79 ""It's mostly plywood sets and static figures."" So is Pooh and it consistently has 40-70min waits. Ditto for Buzz
Originally Posted By 3disneylocations >>>There's barely any AAs in it. It's mostly plywood sets and static figures.<<< spinning heads on plastic bodies - WOW is this cutting edge (what's that smell... Oh right, it's SARCASM - lol)!
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<spinning heads on plastic bodies - WOW is this cutting edge >> Unfortunately Mermaid will have a lot of them as well.
Originally Posted By Malin Part of me really wants to get out to Orlando. To see Potter and of course my favourite Disney Park the Animal Kingdom. Unfortunately I was willing to wait for this Fantasyland expansion to be completed. But since the only attraction I have any interest in seeing is the Mine Train and thats not even began construction. I kind of now think a visit to Orlando should go ahead much earlier than what I was originally planning.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper WWOHP is worth a trip for itself. Spend 3 days at Uni and 3 at WDW and you've got a perfect trip, IMO.
Originally Posted By Malin And if I do visit Orlando I think the Magic Kingdom will be off the itinerary this time.
Originally Posted By Malin *** WWOHP is worth a trip for itself. Spend 3 days at Uni and 3 at WDW and you've got a perfect trip, IMO. *** And 1 day at Sea World would make it an even more perfect trip. And only three days at Disney. Which park would I miss out on But its very encouraging to read people rate WWOHP so highly. That makes me want to lean more towards a trip to Orlando, so thanks.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper ^^^I don't do SeaWorld, but I know people enjoy it. As for Disney, I usually 1 day at Epcot, 1 day at DHS, and 1/2 at MK and 1/2 at Epcot.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper ^^^I don't do SeaWorld, but I know people enjoy it. As for Disney, I usually 1 day at Epcot, 1 day at DHS, and 1/2 at MK and 1/2 at Epcot.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 Spend 3 days at Uni and 3 at WDW and you've got a perfect trip, IMO. --- 3 days for 2 parks -- really ? 2 likely yes- no way 3.... and please don't sell me Citywalk- I still find much of the crowd there to be equivalent to that at the taste of Chicago..not impressed. Call me elitist if you like but it's a tougher crowd than at DtD....my days of hanging with that crowd long over
Originally Posted By vbdad55 I also do not care for Seaworld at all...cheapest feel of all the parks in O town to me. My oldest daughter went this past month with boyfriend and said she would not go back.. aside from Shamu attraction did not care for it at all. She did like Potter as she is a huge Poter fan-- only left saying she felt the need for more Potter than they have today... but what they had was very good quality and fun
Originally Posted By leobloom Malin, SeaWorld is a fun place to visit. Their rides are fun, especially Manta. And some parts of the park have a more quaint feel than what you encounter at WDW and UNI.
Originally Posted By leobloom >> I also do not care for Seaworld at all...cheapest feel of all the parks in O town to me. My oldest daughter went this past month with boyfriend and said she would not go back.. aside from Shamu attraction did not care for it at all. << Then again, Malin, if you're a dyed-in-the-wool pixieduster, you'll likely hate SeaWorld. But you've already shown your intelligence by saying you could part with MK on a trip to Orlando
Originally Posted By Spirit of 74 I don't know how anyone can hate Sea World unless they have an animals in captivity issue. The park is beautiful with great coasters, great shows, great exhibits and great food ... the reasons most people go to parks. It does not have any pixie dust (or free beer anymore), which I believe keeps many addicts away.
