Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Douglas, the Alaskan Legislature BANNED the practice of charging for Rape kits in 2000. So they were forced to pay for the Rape kits in 2000 and 2001.> As the links explain, the law was passed in August. The 2000 kits were paid for in June. <What about the 4 years before 2000?> As I pointed out, there's no evidence that the City of Wasilla charged anyone during the years Gov Palin was mayor, nor was Wasilla mentioned during the hearings about the law. Which is more likely to be accurate - the recollection of Democrat rivals 8 years later, or the actual documentary evidence? Only the most partisan people would chose the former.
Originally Posted By dshyates Hey Doug, here is an interesting article that actually mention both of the links you provided. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200810070007" target="_blank">http://mediamatters.org/column...10070007</a>
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh If by interesting, you mean it repeats accusations and half-truths but provides no evidence, then yes, it's interesting.
