Originally Posted By jonvn I stayed on topic. Topic was gun control. And who should have guns. I would think someone who is a convicted criminal and who has engaged in certain behaviors sort of does not need to have guns. And this is what is wrong with gun control in this country. People who plainly should not have guns being allowed to own them. Guns should be like cars. Title needs to transfer. You should not be able to get a gun unless you are able to produce documentation saying you are entitled to own one.
Originally Posted By peeaanuut but you brought up me who has never been convicted or even charged with a violent crime. But because I stuck a needle into my arm I shouldnt carry a gun? Kind of a broad sweep dont you think?
Originally Posted By peeaanuut But I do agree with you on that. Title should transfer with the gun and there should be approval before hand.
Originally Posted By jonvn That's right, because you stuck a needle in your arm, you ABSOLUTELY should not have a gun! No, I don't think it's a broad sweep. Not only you shouldn't have a gun, but anyone who does use a gun in the commission of a crime should get a life sentence. I brought you up because you brought you up first. You mentioned a criminal past and that's enough for me to say you should not have a gun.
Originally Posted By jonvn Well, you didn't bring your criminal past up, you brought up that you owned a gun. Someone else mentioned you were convicted of a crime.
Originally Posted By jonvn "this line of talk is getting really odd and dark." It's a problem in this country. And you can see it right here, on this board, one reason there is so much gun violence. ANYONE can just go buy a gun and it simply does not matter who they are, what they've done, or what their mental state may be.
Originally Posted By jonvn No, I don't like that anyone can get a gun. The reason someone convicted of drug use should not be in posession of a gun is because when you are under the influence of drugs, you may not understand what you are doing and become violent when you otherwise would not have. That's why drug users should not have gun ownership privileges. This guy in Virginia, if we had some sort of testing and evaluation of gun owners, he'd never would have gotten one. He was plainly nuts.
Originally Posted By disneydad109 thats a problem in this WORLD, It sad but there is trouble everywhere you more than two people.
Originally Posted By jonvn no, it's a problem in this country. We have far and away by a ridiculous amount far and away more deaths by guns than ANYPLACE else.
Originally Posted By pecos bill Jeez, no wonder I never post here anymore, you say something serious and from the heart, only to be completely ignored so the clique can spend 40 off topic posts doing Three Stooges head bops, eye pokes, and stomach punches!
Originally Posted By DVC_dad Ok. Well... I was going to say something but, I am dumbstruck. Nevermind. Let the tennis match continue, pardon the interruption.
Originally Posted By peeaanuut wouldnt the extra L's be needed to extend the sound as was done in the movie? so I think DVC is correct.
