Originally Posted By DlandDug Now, now. The spotted puppies simply found those guns under the sofa cushion. It could happen to anybody. LIVING IN A DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED POLICE STATE.
Originally Posted By TomSawyer I know section 4604. I worked with section 4604. And section 4605, you are no section 4604.
Originally Posted By hightp "Come now Douglas... you know perfectly well my intent was to outlaw them for civilians only. Those in the military, non-civilian militia (National Guard) or law enforcement personnel would of course be allowed to have them." I find this a very interesting comment (#57). If you outlaw firearms for civilians, only, then what are they to protect themselves with? The courts have said time and again that the police have no duty to protect the individual citizens, just to the law itself. So what do you do when someone breaks into you house, or threatens you with physical violence. As we know criminals don't obey the law (that's why their criminals) it's entirely likely they will threaten the populace with guns. I suppose if the police could arrive within seconds of being called, there would be no need for a handgun, but I think there are legitimate reasons for owning a firearm.
Originally Posted By CrouchingTigger >>So what do you do when someone breaks into you house, or threatens you with physical violence. << Since you don't have a handgun, you whack them over the head with the barrel of your howitzer.
Originally Posted By mele <<So what do you do when someone breaks into you house, or threatens you with physical violence.>> Contraband lawn darts.
Originally Posted By TomSawyer <<So what do you do when someone breaks into you house, or threatens you with physical violence.>> I wouldn't have a gun, but my three-year old would school them with his Fisher Price "Little People .38".
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<So what do you do when someone breaks into you house, or threatens you with physical violence.>> Move to a better neighborhood. You don't see Cape Code Joe totin' any danged handgun. ;-)
Originally Posted By cape cod joe to mele guilty as charged-I did evanescent routine too but I warned that I was playing the back nine here so it wasn't like I just bolted! To Trip-Also guilty BUT----You might have read my post of couple months back where we have to call the polees at the office about once every quarter as our office isn't behind a moat with hockey players to protect us. This is a cool thread--- I follow about 50% of this stuff!
Originally Posted By cape cod joe Just read 200n after I sent post NO yacht ----How do I do it? I'm in debt up to my EYEBALLS!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted By cape cod joe 108--at least you warned Tom like me so I think that's legal? Let's ask Douglas which code that may violate?
Originally Posted By mele I don't even know what the heck an "evanescent routine" is but the day one of your arguments chases me out of WE, is the day I'll eat my hat.
Originally Posted By cape cod joe I'm on that low carb thing mele so hats aren't that great for me but they do have fiber and ruffage evanescent is an esoteric epithet indicating fleeting in an ephemeral way. I hope that clears that up?
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<but they do have fiber and ruffage>> Not a good thing if you are on the beach away from restrooms... (although it might float in a moat).
Originally Posted By cape cod joe Not that bad if it floats in the moat depending on the configuration? Plus we wouldn't need the hockey players for protection.
