Originally Posted By fkurucz I was wondering if this announcement hints that there will be a "happy ending" in the final book. If Rowling gives her fans the finger and the final book has an "unhappy ending" then I think then that "Harry Potter Land" could lose a great deal of its appeal.
Originally Posted By twirlnhurl I don't understand how an unhappy ending would be a "middle finger". Or do you mean a evil triumphs over good ending? Where the main good characters die and the main bad characters live?
Originally Posted By RoadTrip I don't think Rowling would ever do something like that. I mean that would be like killing off Padme and Mace Windu while letting Anakin and Palpatine live. Oops... never mind. ;-)
Originally Posted By Skellington88 The ending of Harry Potter 7 will be similar to the ending of Pirates At World's End. Its gonna be bittersweet and show that good overcomes evil but at a price.
Originally Posted By MPierce >> I don't think Rowling would ever do something like that. I mean that would be like killing off Padme and Mace Windu while letting Anakin and Palpatine live. Oops... never mind. ;-) << You Star Wars junkie you.
Originally Posted By gurgitoy2 "The ending of Harry Potter 7 will be similar to the ending of Pirates At World's End. Its gonna be bittersweet and show that good overcomes evil but at a price. " This, I agree with.
Originally Posted By fkurucz I don't think that many fans will be happy if Harry dies and evil prevails, but I think that even if Harry dies and good prevails that would still be a negative for HP Land. <I don't think Rowling would ever do something like that. I mean that would be like killing off Padme and Mace Windu while letting Anakin and Palpatine live.> I was thinking of something along the lines of Luke defeating the Emperor and becoming the new Sith Lord (a la Kyle Katarn). That would have gone over real well with the fans, not!
Originally Posted By MPierce >> was thinking of something along the lines of Luke defeating the Emperor and becoming the new Sith Lord (a la Kyle Katarn). That would have gone over real well with the fans, not! << I don't think it would have been very popular, but you could have squeezed 3 more movies out of it. It would be racing Rocky for the most number of sequels.
Originally Posted By brotherdave I think James Bond has them all beat when it comes to sequels!!! ;-)
