Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>Like the people who think they saw the Yeti being taken out for repairs? Or the people who thought they saw changes in the descent curtains that one time..? Or the time before that..? Or the time before that..? Or how about the 8 months before any of those magical morons realized they repainted the support poles of Electric Umbrella?<< Funny, that was all you, with your reports. Anyway, just as before, you should just stick to pictures and an opinion. The immature "I'm right, you are not" bit has been played, and it's getting humorous! As for your outdated proof...Yes, it has. There have been slight changes as they have done work, and then stopped, about a year ago. There's a whole area near the old communication scenes that has it's star curtains removed and pushed back. You can EASILY see the gap.
Originally Posted By HokieSkipper <<Not even. We rode it 5 months after opening (if that) and the Yeti was broken every time. And the smoke effect in the station only worked once out of the three times we rode. One of my major disappointments. EE was what convinced me it was time for a WDW trip>> He worked basically all of my CP program in spring 2008. The last time I saw him working correctly was DAK's 10th Anniversary.
Originally Posted By MPierce >> Or how about the 8 months before any of those magical morons realized they repainted the support poles of Electric Umbrella? << They painted the support poles of Electric Umbrella?
Originally Posted By MPierce Here is a fact Merf. Several people that have been provided inside information in the past were told SSE was not complete. Sometimes inside information given one day changes the next or was misinterpeted to begin with. Personally I like to believe people with a proven track record are only passing on information they have been told. Why would any of them make something up?
Originally Posted By mousermerf Again "people have been told" but there's no photos, no proof, no evidence. I took photos, there's no new physical evidence, and anyone who goes and looks at the descent can't see anything different. And I never reported anything had changed.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer >>>I took photos, there's no new physical evidence, and anyone who goes and looks at the descent can't see anything different. And I never reported anything had changed.<<< Merf, honestly, no disrespect, sick of fighting, BUT THAT WAS TWO YEARS AGO. Like Pierce said, it CAN change from day to day. Why don't you go get us some pictures to shut us up, because if you can point out that things didn't change, I'll eat my foot, you know that. Oh, the things I say for EPCOT.
Originally Posted By mousermerf You only say that because you know i'm in California right now and hope that'll end the argument and make it go away and magically you'll look ok. Nope, not happening. You make accusations - where's your proof of these changes you claimed happened?
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer I had no idea you were in Cali....Don't care to keep tabs on people. Apologies. Didn't make an accusation, in the first place. I DID say, however, that there HAD been changes in the Geosphere. If you took my tone for something in excess and inflaming, again, apologies. A strong writing style serves you well.
Originally Posted By mousermerf <<<I DID say, however, that there HAD been changes in the Geosphere.>>> Of which you have no proof and/or are willing to provide none. Why should I or anyone else believe that statement then?
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer ^^^ And nor did you. So...Stalemate. Wanna prolong this some more?
Originally Posted By mousermerf I provided proof. You have done nothing to provide proof of your counter claim that things have changed - the burden of proof is yours.
Originally Posted By mousermerf For that matter - i provided proof the first time people made false claims that they were screens that they were not. You are asserting that changed. You need to provide proof. You have none. You are a liar.
Originally Posted By EPCOT Explorer Yawn, Merf. The prolonging goes on. If I cared about people on the internet, I suppose this would bother me, but it's fake, this is just Disney we are talking about, and someone is doing this just to feed his sense of self importance by acting through the veil of the internet. How am I supposed to offer proof on the things I read and on the people I talk to? I'll do what I can in picture but constant belligerence won't work.
Originally Posted By u k fan So Harry Potter then... I'm not a huge fan of the Universal parks and even less so Harry Potter, but this looks amazing!!!
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo I thought you liked HP kiz, or did Gel put you off? But yes, whereas I was marginally interested in this addition when it was announced and I saw the concept art, now I am quite excited.
Originally Posted By u k fan No, I have no interest in HP at all. Can't stand it. Genesis got bored and didn't read the last 2 books. I have seen the films, but not really out of choice. I expect I'll see the remaining movies in the cinema and then never watch them again!!!
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo I stopped reading at book 6, Sarah went the distance with them. I must say, I quite like the movies though. And this does look like a very cool addition to a theme park. It is tempting to go when the kids are tall enough.
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo That said, I think we are going to try the kids on Crush in June. They are both tall enough (and Mikey is nearly tall enough for RNR Coaster, though I do not think he is ready yet.
