Originally Posted By disneywatcher >> I still feel that people expected too much in 2001. It's just not logical to expect a park to be complete when it opens. << Actually, there was growing skepticism directed at DCA well before it was even under construction. In fact, there was disappointment on the day plans for the park were first announced to the media and public. However, even with such doubt, I didn't realize the planners and executives at the DisCo would allow something as pathetic as Mulholland Madness or Bountiful Farms. But now that I think of it, yes, I guess you can say we did expect, if not "too much" in 2001, then certainly at least something that wouldn't be so second-rate.
Originally Posted By bean i agree that some areas of DCA were mistakes (route 66, entrance plaza and backlot) but just to get some things straight. bountiful valley farm and Mullholland Madness were always considered temporary until more permanent attractions were approved
Originally Posted By WorldDisney ^^Problem is bean it's been 6 years and this stuff is still here. I mean, 1 or 2 years okay, but if DCA is at it's 10th anniversary and we are still looking at these eye sores, then that will be sad.
