Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan That's the weirdest aspect of this whole thing -- him expecting everyone to believe that he didn't know the outcome of those cases. It's beyond ridiculous. It's one thing for him to say he didn't do anything wrong, and that the powers that be in the National Restaurant Association decided it made better financial sense to pay his accusers a year's salary and leave it at that. I don't know whether that's true or not, but at least it's plausible. But to say (at the beginning of the day) he never followed the proceedings, and then to slowly begin to "remember" details is just nonsense. Anyone involved in legal proceedings is damn well going to follow developments.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 Of course. Mostly lost in the story yesterday was that this woman told two people about Cain's advance AT THE TIME, and they have both sworn that yes, in fact, she did. So they'd have to be lying too.
