Originally Posted By Beaumandy << You put out junk from ideologues as if it were factual information, and you think this somehow equates to me being nailed?>> Yes, you got nailed because you called the AirAmerica story " junk ", yet when asked to prove his story was "junk" based on the information in the story, you started spinning like a teacup with 5 kids in it going full blast. Your still spinning and you still have not been attacked personally. Your opinions and style have been commented on, but personally I have no idea who you are.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy <<Frankly beau, since you refuse to be civilized, insist on using words like "stupid" and show respect, no, you're not worthy of any serious discussion.>> I see... you can let someone call the President a murderer or Hitler or the war was based on lies.. but I can't call that opinion stupid and ask the person who said this to back it up? Got it. Your trying to control the content on here like a facist. ( It's fun to use that word ) You make rude comments all the time, so your not exactly the guy who should be pretending to Mr. Rogers complete with the little sweater and nifty sneakers.
Originally Posted By jonvn "Yes, you got nailed because you called the AirAmerica story " junk "," Only because it was, and is, because it was written by a biased person with a political agenda. This is very clear, and was very clear the first few times it was said to you. In the meantime, I was told that I don't believe anything unless I read it in the NY Times, and whatever else was tossed at me. I simply do not think you are able to hold a reasonable discussion, if this is all you can do, and it does not speak well for your position on matters of politics and whatever else is spoken of here.
Originally Posted By StillThePassHolder I'll say it again, beau. I'm willing to continue to work on changing. But if you keep going down this path, if this place gets shut down, it's on your head.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy << Only because it was, and is, because it was written by a biased person with a political agenda. >> Jon, you called the story junk based on the writers supposed bias. You were then asked to provide examples of the writer saying things that were not factual since you called the story " junk ". You STILL have not provided any examples of this " biased " writer being not factual. That is where you got nailed. But at this point we are going in cirlces. The people eating popcorn might want to vote on who is spinning and who is not. <<I simply do not think you are able to hold a reasonable discussion, if this is all you can do, and it does not speak well for your position on matters of politics and whatever else is spoken of here.>> This is the same very lame and juvinile tactic STPH uses in order to attemot to discredit the person who they disagree with. It's this exact tactic that makes me say you are arrogant. You are hinting that you know more than everyone else so your not going to " waste your time " discussing issues with someone not up to "your level". The left use this tactic all the time when they can't back up their nonsese and their 35 seconds of talking points have run out. But nice try.
Originally Posted By Beaumandy <<I'll say it again, beau. I'm willing to continue to work on changing. But if you keep going down this path, if this place gets shut down, it's on your head>> To try and set me up as the bad guy in advace is not going to work either. I am guilty of sticking to my guns and expecting people to back up their argument. You are still as snarky as ever and people see it. If this section gets shut dow it's because enough people whined to the ADMIN. I have never gone to the admin. Have you?
Originally Posted By Beaumandy The role of victim and peacemaker you are playing STPH is really funny. Keep going with it. People are loving this action tonight.
