Originally Posted By Longhorn12 >The white house has changed it's story about the capture of OBL to the point were even Rachel Madow had to acknowledge that she wondered what really happened.< I still wonder what the real reason for invading Iraq was.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 "Yea I was right about Obama admin wanting to read terrorists their right on the battlefield." "The white house has changed it's story about the capture of OBL to the point were even Rachel Madow had to acknowledge that she wondered what really happened." What do those two statements even have to do with each other? No one was EVER read Miranda rights "on the battlefield," number one. And shooting a guy in the eye is about as far from reading him his rights as you can get, so how does the killing of OBL even tangentially play into this myth of Obama wanting to "read people their rights on the battlefield?" THINK, Donny, think.
Originally Posted By Labuda "I still wonder what the real reason for invading Iraq was." Bush wanted to finish what his Daddy couldn't.
Originally Posted By BPSJP >>Donny"Yea I was right about Obama admin wanting to read terrorists their right on the battlefield."The white house has changed it's story about the capture of OBL to the point were even Rachel Madow had to acknowledge that she wondered what really happened.<< Donny, be very careful you will soon be called a sock-puppet for not worshipping at the feet of Obama. Even worse, they will say you are really me. I know I'm not me, I'm someone else playing me, who is really some one else. Well something like that, so hurry and say BO is perfect, before the un-holy 3 come after you too! Lol lol lol
Originally Posted By Mr X Best to carefully avoid typos when you write stuff like that, dude. Though I agree with the sentiment.
Originally Posted By BPSJP >> Best to carefully avoid typos when you write stuff like that, dude. Though I agree with the sentiment.<< I'm on my iPhone there are going to be typos! But nice to see you playing fair.
