Originally Posted By mele >>Supposedly they wanted to film whether or not the office staff "cared" or "were concerned" that the phones were out and their constituents couldn't reach them at all.<< So, they're supposed to have kittens about this? Throwing huge fits even when they know that people are working on the problem. Because people call Senators with real emergencies that need to be dealt with at that very moment? Who buys this crap? (Oh yeah. My relatives. Meh.)
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt James O'Keefe is making headlines again: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/04/okeefe.cnn.prank/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/...ogle_cnn</a>
Originally Posted By Mr X I have the feeling that situation was planned to be even more sinister than it appears. No evidence, just a feeling. +shudders+
Originally Posted By mawnck Ratted out by a cohort. It's nice to know that some of those people walk the talk.
Originally Posted By mele <<O'Keefe said. "After all, as all liberal reporters do, she was trying to "seduce" (a metaphor) me so she could get more for her story. It would be fun, I thought, to turn the tables in jest.>> Yes, ALL LIBERAL reporters do this.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt Maybe there is a god after all. James O'Keefe has agreed to cough up $100,000 in an out of court settlement to a former Acorn employee who was involved in his infamous "sting" on the organization. <a href="http://gawker.com/5989340/james-okeefe-will-pay-100000-apologize-to-former-acorn-employee" target="_blank">http://gawker.com/5989340/jame...employee</a>
Originally Posted By Dabob2 I don't expect that this story will even see the light of day on the same Fox News that trumpeted the original (heavily edited) video like there was no tomorrow.
