Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 >>Is Miceage still claiming it will be a 60th exhibit?<< I don't think so. If that was still the case, they would probably have done something about it by now. But since it is (un)officially closed until at least NEXT September, I doubt there's going to be a 60th exhibit over there. >>The "insiders" at those sites are liars, phonies and frauds and that cold-hard fact has been reaffirmed countless times!<< Since the "insiders" supposedly have strong ties to management, does that mean that the people in management are "liars", too?
Originally Posted By Dis-Philip No, 85, those liars lie about having strong ties to management as well. They do not. You're really pushing your luck, 85. Knock it off!
Originally Posted By Jim in Merced CA Knock what off? The claim that someone's rumors and conjecture are more accurate than someone else's? So's your old man! :-/
Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 I will try and post this as carefully as possible (and can someone other than Dis-Philip please respond this time, without having to be so upset about it?)... According to someone at WDWMagic.com, it was said that Toontown was not what the article referred to as a "favorite feature" of the park. They said that things could change, obviously, but that right now, Star Wars as Toontown replacement is still pretty likely.
Originally Posted By Dis-Philip You're still missing the point and pushing your luck, 85. As has already been said, no one at WDWMagic is to be trusted. How many times do PeterPan1313 and I have to constantly re-hammer this point into your thick skull?! Plus, Toontown IS a favorite feature in the park. Please come back, PeterPan1313....
Originally Posted By phruby Where did all of these sock puppets come from? Did someone loose them in the laundry again?
Originally Posted By doombuggy Dis-Phillip=PP13 you aint fooling any one, your using a 15 year old sock puppet and pushing YOUR luck.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <The claim that someone's rumors and conjecture are more accurate than someone else's? So's your old man! :-/> LOL! Exactly. In fact, neither Miceage (especially lately), WDWMagic, nor PP13 (or his sock puppet) have proven reliable. And some of it is just laughably off the mark.
Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 >>In fact, neither Miceage (especially lately), WDWMagic, nor PP13 (or his sock puppet) have proven reliable.<< I have no idea how reliable Screamscape or even the LA Times are, but the article from that about Star Wars and Tom Staggs has been referenced on Screamscape: "Tom Staggs, did seem to confirm that Star Wars attractions were still in the works for Disneyland however, and that they would be added to the park in a new area, and not as a replacement attraction where some other beloved attraction would have to be removed. This seems to confirm the rumors that management had decided not to add more Star Wars attractions to Tomorrowland, but instead create an all new land for them elsewhere in the park. Such an expansion could display some of the backstage area behind Toontown, or certain facilities which might need to be moves elsewhere." As I said countless times before, I really want to see Toontown saved, which may or may not be the case if this article is to be believed. On the other hand, however, though the article did mention likely needing to relocate backstage behind Toontown and/or elsewhere, they did not take into account the issue of working around the fireworks. Some have speculated that the Star Wars area could be completely enclosed to remain open while the fireworks are on, and while doable, it doesn't seem likely. Also, as I just said before, the article mentioned moving backstage area behind Toontown, but I would think that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to do any kind of expansion back there without affecting Toontown. It also brings up the question of what this means for Innoventions.
Originally Posted By perlster "Such an expansion could display some of the backstage area behind Toontown" LOL at the "English" being as correct as the "article"
Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 >>"Such an expansion could display some of the backstage area behind Toontown" LOL at the "English" being as correct as the "article"<< I think they meant "displace". I think that was just a typo.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 < I have no idea how reliable Screamscape or even the LA Times are, > Screamscape is a rumor site (and at least freely admits it). So it's as reliable as the rumors it gets from other places. Which is to say - all over the map. The LA Times is just repeating what Skaggs said, which as I pointed out before, was about as vague as it could possibly be. Everyone else is reading into what it "seems" to mean, which is a fool's errand.
Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 >>Everyone else is reading into what it "seems" to mean, which is a fool's errand.<< What does it "seem" to mean to you, if not to everyone else?
Originally Posted By Dabob2 "Seem" is a word that means "it could actually be this in reality, but it might not be." And indeed that's what it means here.
Originally Posted By Disneylandfan85 >>"Seem" is a word that means "it could actually be this in reality, but it might not be." And indeed that's what it means here.<< Forgive me if it seems like I'm being ignorant, but what I meant was, when these people read into what the rumor seems to mean, what do they think it means (i.e., about Toontown and backstage areas)?
Originally Posted By Dis-Philip (Sigh) The sooner PP1313 makes his triumphant to this forum, the better...
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt Every so often these discussions detour off into strange places. This is definitely one of those times.
