Originally Posted By Dabob2 Again, you may be too young to remember earlier examples that were easily as bad/corny/cringe inducing. But some people love the very corniness
Originally Posted By Dabob2 And I missed a perfectly good "Dalmatians sequel." Corny as that would have been...
Originally Posted By gadzuux The Boatniks is classic disney, so is Flubber and the Apple Dumplin' Gang. Just sayin' - "classic Disney" doesn't mean it's good.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "Please Hans, don't call what Whoopi did classic Disney. To me she was like a fingernail against a chalk board." You've obviously never seen The Shaggy DA or The Cat From Outer Space.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "The Boatniks is classic disney, so is Flubber and the Apple Dumplin' Gang." Exactly what I'm saying.
Originally Posted By davewasbaloo Condor Man tocks! And let us not forget One of our Dinosaurs is Missing, or the Devil and Max Devlin.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt Whoopi's scripted corn in Golden Dreams seems almost Shakespearian compared to those awful films Dave.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 But did anything reach the plangent depths of Snowball Express? Superdad, maybe. And only maybe.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 And a lot of people didn't. And both are valid. Like I said, that's what makes the world go 'round.
Originally Posted By unforgetabledal >>And a lot of people didn't. And both are valid. Like I said, that's what makes the world go 'round.<< Thank you for pointing out that some people like some films, others don't. Yes others Thought Apple Dumpling gang was bad, I loved it. So glade you feel that way, did not think you did. But nice to see you are open to other opinions.
Originally Posted By Dabob2 <Thank you for pointing out that some people like some films, others don't.> Well, I thought I might have to, considering your earlier comments about how GD had "no place" in a Disney park, while others thought it was a) good; b). fit right in; c). was very much in the old tradition. You can disagree, and that's fine. As you say, it's nice to be open to other opinions.
Originally Posted By unforgetabledal >>Well, I thought I might have to, considering your earlier comments about how GD<< Yes considering your earlier comments thought the same thing about you. >>You can disagree, and that's fine. As you say, it's nice to be open to other opinions<< Yes,some people are really closed minded, yet think they are open minded, you know what I mean? But glade to know we both cherish reading another persons different point of view?
Originally Posted By Dabob2 >>Well, I thought I might have to, considering your earlier comments about how GD<< <Yes considering your earlier comments thought the same thing about you.> How so? I've said from the beginning that I understand you didn't like it, and others didn't either, but that others did. (Me, I was somewhere in the middle - not minding the non-sanitized history at all, but groaning at some of the corniness). You, on the other hand, seem almost offended that others could have liked the thing. >>You can disagree, and that's fine. As you say, it's nice to be open to other opinions<< <Yes,some people are really closed minded, yet think they are open minded, you know what I mean? But glade to know we both cherish reading another persons different point of view?> See above. You really don't seem to like others' points of view, at least on this. You said about 100 posts ago that you were through even commenting on this... yet whenever anybody (me, davewasbaloo, Hans, whoever) said something nice about GD, you couldn't let it go as an equally valid opinion. It has been kind of interesting to watch. You obviously also don't like being called on it.
