Originally Posted By Yookeroo "Yookeroo...You know you don't have to actually comment on an opinion that you don't agree with, right?" Yeah. Your point is...?
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>You've prevented zero tragedies. Well done you.<< Thank you. Our record is equal then.
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin MY POINT IS...it seems to me that gun people will not stand for any compromise at all and gun safety people keep edging back their request for safe and SANE regulations and nobody is getting anywhere. So maybe it is time to pry your guns out of your cold dead hands. But the conversation is going no where.
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin Yep...got a problem with that? I could have said NRA people...but not all gun enthusiasts are members of the NRA, are they? Or I ccould have said gun nuts...why are you picking that one phrase out?
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 Then I'd like Disney to award more badges of honor. See? Win/win. Careless gun owners banned thereby reducing the likelihood of a tragedy, and they get to feel wonderful about being banned. I knew we'd figure it out.<< I would much rather Disney kick out those who fake being handicap to get front of line passes or kick out those who use strollers as weapons to run people over....
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>I would much rather Disney kick out those who fake being handicap to get front of line passes or kick out those who use strollers as weapons to run people over....<< I don't think it's an either/or scenario. Kick out people who break the rules. Keep the ones who potentially endanger the public out for good. No second chances.
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 I don't think it's an either/or scenario. Kick out people who break the rules. Keep the ones who potentially endanger the public out for good. No second chances.<< I agree but Disney above else loves money, they aren't going to do anything that impacts their bottom line too much. Correct me if I am wrong but don't you have to do something really really bad to get banned from Disneyland currently?
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>Correct me if I am wrong but don't you have to do something really really bad to get banned from Disneyland currently?<< Must be. Apparently even leaving behind a loaded gun isn't that much of an issue.
Originally Posted By sjhym333 I'm surprised that we have discussed this for 131posts. The guy is an idiot. Disney should have banned him for being an idiot and for endangering people. Enough said. Lol
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 I'm surprised that we have discussed this for 131posts. The guy is an idiot. Disney should have banned him for being an idiot and for endangering people. Enough said. Lol<< But they didn't, hence 132+ posts...
Originally Posted By Yookeroo "Same as yours, I guess!" Your point was if you're tired of a discussion you should avoid that topic? That's really your point? You sure did a crappy job of making it.
Originally Posted By Goofyernmost Well, sort of. My point was that you have not been elected sheriff and therefore what someone else posts isn't any of your business. You can disagree with it, but you are not the final decision maker about what shows up on a public forum. You're choices are to read it and disagree with a logical argument or you could read it and just not comment at all or you could just leave the thread, but, you do not have the right to sarcastically put someone down for expressing their opinion. And then make exactly the same type of off topic post yourself. Yours is apparently justified and theirs is not, according to you. I just reminded you that you were guilty of the same type of post that was previously posted. The pot calling the kettle black. And I was equally guilty of making a copy cat post to illustrate that point. None of it is worth all this time though.
Originally Posted By Yookeroo "My point was that you have not been elected sheriff and therefore what someone else posts isn't any of your business." Of course it is. It was posted to a public forum. If she wanted to keep it private, that sure was a stupid way to do that. "You can disagree with it, but you are not the final decision maker about what shows up on a public forum." I never claimed to be. I didn't tell her not to post. "You're choices are to read it and disagree with a logical argument or you could read it and just not comment at all or you could just leave the thread, but, you do not have the right to sarcastically put someone down for expressing their opinion." Actually, I kind of do. "And then make exactly the same type of off topic post yourself." If I had dinged her for being off topic, you might have a point. "I just reminded you that you were guilty of the same type of post that was previously posted." Except, of course, I wasn't. I didn't complain that she was off topic. I pointed out that her problem with the subject was hypocritical since she was complaining about a topic that she could have easily avoided but was obviously interested enough in to click on the topic and decide to reply to. If there are topics I'm tired of, I actually avoid them. I certainly don't jump in and reply to them.
Originally Posted By SpokkerJones "Must be. Apparently even leaving behind a loaded gun isn't that much of an issue." How about being a decent human being and just turning it into lost and found? If people from disarmed states and countries go to Disney World and are alarmed at the sight of a weapon, it's their own fault for letting their politicians disarm them.
Originally Posted By CuriousConstance Yeah, I long for the day when finding a loaded weapon at every turn isn't alarming.
