Originally Posted By dlkozy I will state my opinion on a topic as I see that you do often Hans. I was refering to X's inordinate number of posts where he is constantly bashing one LPer or another as exhibited by his statement: >>>" But then again, it's always funny when people rip on Mormons. They're just funny..."<<< Troll.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>"Why the personal attack, kozy?"<<< LOL! Coming from the KING of the sling of personal attacks is really LOL!
Originally Posted By Mr X Troll? Why? I think it's funny when people rip on gays too. I'm a big South Park fan. What's your point? What constitutes an "inordinate" number of posts, anyway? I'm not the top poster here on LP. Far from it. Lots of people contribute more than I. Kozy, you need to do something about that anger problem you're grappling with. Seek help or something. You have a real problem.
Originally Posted By Mr X ***>>>"Why the personal attack, kozy?"<<< LOL! Coming from the KING of the sling of personal attacks is really LOL!*** Anger management, Kozy. It might help.
Originally Posted By Mr X More anger. Gee, you should really do something about that. I'm worried about you.
Originally Posted By dlkozy I don't find in past rulings by the FPPC the length of time that they usually take in their investigations. Anyone know? Hopefully it will be a quick investigation and that the matter can be put to rest.
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin And those who are responsible are jailed. Like the mormon daddy's who were taken away from their wives (usually 3 or more) and children (innumerable). Where do these people find the gall to tell ANYONE else how to be married.
Originally Posted By Sara Tonin So the mormon stance is that a marriage should be between a man and womEn?
Originally Posted By Mr F Mr. X is Right, the "No on 8" commercial was a satire of what Mormons are trying to do to same-sex marriages. Just because he's right, and you can't come up with a GOOD argument doesn't mean you should rip on him dlkozy.
Originally Posted By Mr F "So the mormon stance is that a marriage should be between a man and womEn?" Yes the Mormon's view of their "Sacred" marriages is that it should only be between a man & a women...or 2...or 3...or 6...or 10.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>" Like the mormon daddy's who were taken away from their wives (usually 3 or more) and children (innumerable). Where do these people find the gall to tell ANYONE else how to be married. "<<< >>>"So the mormon stance is that a marriage should be between a man and womEn?"<<< You are showing your ignorance on the subject. FLDS are no more a Mormon than a Catholic is.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>"Yes the Mormon's view of their "Sacred" marriages is that it should only be between a man & a women...or 2...or 3...or 6...or 10."<<< And yet another person lacking correct info.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>"Just because he's right, and you can't come up with a GOOD argument doesn't mean you should rip on him dlkozy."<<< F-there wasn't anything "Good" about that arguement at all.
Originally Posted By gottaluvdavillains <<You are showing your ignorance on the subject. FLDS are no more a Mormon than a Catholic is. >>> Maybe the Mormon Church doesn't want to accept them as members - But many of these groups claim to be fundamentalist Mormons. They follow the Book of Mormon and it's teachings - however they do so by following the orignal versions - before some of the evolutions.
Originally Posted By utahjosh <But you're not going to admit that they have violated the separation of church and state.> Ridiculous propaganda right there. What laws about the church and state being separate did the LDS church "violate?" <And you are not going to even mention the part about an entity headquatered in one state influencing politics in another state.> Makes no difference whatsoever.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>"Maybe the Mormon Church doesn't want to accept them as members "<<< That is because they are NOT! >>>" But many of these groups claim to be fundamentalist Mormons..."<<< They can CLAIM to be anything that they would like-it doesn't make them one.
Originally Posted By dlkozy >>>"And you are not going to even mention the part about an entity headquatered in one state influencing politics in another state.>"<<< Are you even aware of how much money came from other states to support No?
