Originally Posted By chickendumpling D'oh! I did it wrong. A Fish Called Wanda, Die Another Day. I am such a dork.
Originally Posted By Lisann22 STOP! PLEASE, THE TWO OF YOU JUST STOP! YOUR MAKING A MESS OF EVERYTHING... <go sit in a corner or something> Jeez Louise or Thelma or Wanda! ---------------------------------------- A Fish Called Wanda, A Miracle on 34th Street,
Originally Posted By Pixie Glitter Dumpling, I think you may have violated one of the rules of the thread by using a movie title twice. Well, actually, you didn't use it twice, per se, but you did use a movie title which had previously been used is what I'm saying. So I'm not sure what we do now; I mean it's all really rather confusing. And heaven knows, we don't dare ask Lisa what to do because she'll just go all homegirl on us. Again. So maybe we should put it up to a vote. Do you think that would be a fair way to resolve this issue? Or perhaps we could establish a governing committee of some sort to oversee the thread. Yes, the more I think about it, the more I think a governing committee is the way to go. Of course, we'll need to have elections for the governing committee, but before that we'll need to nominate people and give them time to campaign. And there will have to be election foremen to oversee the whole thing and check the backgrounds of any potential candidates to ensure their suitability. . . .
Originally Posted By Lisann22 A Fish Called Wanda, A Miracle on 34th Street, Shall We Dance, The Last Tango In Paris? End of story...next!
Originally Posted By chickendumpling I couldn't agree more. A pre-selection nominating subcommittee on the committee to nominate a governing committee to select a rules committee is just what this thread needs. I understand that Inspector57 is quite good at coordinating seemingly overwhelming tasks such as this. Perhaps we could start there. On an aside, however, I must respectfully disagree with your current interpretation of Rule #1 as stated in Post #1. I see nothing specifically prohiting double usage. However, reasonable minds may differ which is precisely why this committee is necessary. We would be remiss to not initiate said committee.
Originally Posted By Pixie Glitter Exactly. You are precisely right in that last statement, Dumpling, because although you are clearly of superior intellect, I would beg to differ on your interpretation of the thread rules. It seems to me that it was inherently implied that there should be no multiple usage of movie titles lest the thread become repetitive and dull. And Lisann22, although she is most certainly an Evil Nemesis, an irritant, and a SAH, is definitely not dull, so I cannot imagine that she intended for a thread that she started to be so. And may I just say how lucky she is to have you and me, Dumpling, to look out for her best interests this way? How many people, I ask you, would devote so much time, thought, and effort into helping her out with her little thread? We are saints if I do say so myself.
Originally Posted By chickendumpling Yes, Pixie Glitter. I see your point. LiZann is obviously not dull. Rather fiery actually. But, be that as it may, rules must be specific. And, because double usage was not prohibitied I think I may just say: Back To The Future, Somewhere In Time, Chicken Little, Die Another Day. I bet even the Evil Nemesis would agree with that right about now.
Originally Posted By Lisann22 Back To The Future, Somewhere In Time, Chicken Little, Die Hard!!!!!!!!!! End of story. Next...
Originally Posted By LadyKluck >>>><sniff sniff> Anyone else smell the FRIED CHICKEN??!!<<<<<< HEY! ~:> Gone With the Wind
Originally Posted By chickendumpling And, of course, I wholeheartedly agree that we are remarkably considerate and thoughtful to consider the potential confusion that could be had in this thread if it were not for the proper committee. Saints? Indeed, we are. Now, as I was saying... Thelma and Louise,
Originally Posted By Lisann22 Ughhhhhh! Diamonds are Forever, Gone With The Wind, Thelma and Louise, Breakdown,
