Originally Posted By TomSawyer It's already thrown out. ecdc brings up a good point, though - the handwritten arguments in this case are just as valid as the arguments used before the Supreme Court, and in some cases the arguments were exactly the same. But this was funny because it was a God Warrior from Dismal Seepage, Nebraska and it was hand written instead of being presented by men wearing suits whose legal team was financed by a major religious institution.
Originally Posted By Kar2oonMan >>Dismal Seepage, Nebraska<< LOL! >> instead of being presented by men wearing suits whose legal team was financed by a major religious institution<< That's funny in a different way. Not funny ha-ha, in that it's funny how someone could do what it takes to earn a law degree and yet be able to abandon common sense and rational thought to represent a case in favor of discrimination.
Originally Posted By TomSawyer "it's funny how someone could do what it takes to earn a law degree and yet be able to abandon common sense" Have you seen who the GOP is offering up these days?
Originally Posted By RoadTrip You're giving the old girl too much credit. Anyone could do it. <a target="blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://glossynews.com/092702/dummies.jpg">http://glossynews.com/092702/dummies.jpg</a>
