Originally Posted By Hista98 5 bucks says the cards for Auora get thrown in the trash seconds after she gets backstage! Why isn't Snow wjite getting an area as well?? she has the ride why not an Mand G next to it??
Originally Posted By Witches of Morva ORWEN: I think you just answered your own question, duckling. Snow White has an attraction already. She's not so selfish that she can't share the spot light for other pricesses. Plus Aurora hasn't had ANY sort of attraction at the Magic Kingdom before. It's high time she got some attention, too!
Originally Posted By leobloom Aurora is, like, at best a second-class princess. She ain't got nothin' on SW, Cinderella, and some of the newer ones. I'm surprised any kids would any know who she is. I don't think I would "recognize" her if I saw her in the park.
Originally Posted By bobbelee9 Would I use the coloring area or even the Pooh playground, at this point no! But when my kids were younger certainly. You can't push little ones all day long and not expect a meltdown. Coloring or Pooh are great downtime, and they don't waste as much time as a trip back to the hotel for pool or nap. Some of the parents I've seen there can also use some downtime.
Originally Posted By brotherdave I guess the Kidcot stations at Epcot were TOO successful. Thus, "Aurora's Coloring Cottage sponsored by Crayola"! Actually, the Cinderella "exhibit" (I just CAN'T call it an attraction) sounds interesting and "magical". Even Belle's Library m&g might be ok. But the Aurora cottage is just a complete waste. It looks very promising on the outside, but once people get inside, they're going to be saying "We waited an hour for THIS?!!" Sorry, I can't even see the kids being that excited for it. I still say, put in a Captain Hook's pirate ship and let the kids explore and have fun. They can color at home...
Originally Posted By oc_dean >>Everyone seems to be shocked by all the meet and greets, and I would like to see others attractions also, but I understand the reasoning for the meet and greets. << Because it's cheaper than designing real rides - That might entail ingenuity, innovation, and state of the art technologies.
Originally Posted By Bob Paris Besides - if you can raise a generation on a watered down Disney that only expects colouring in birthday cards and meeting a CM in a dress and tiara, then they will expect even less in the future. I am sorry but people from our generation are now relics to the modern Disney management and they would be happy if we'd just shut up and go away.
Originally Posted By Spyderman The only way the M & G's will be worth it is if they bring back the charecters in their peasant costumes
Originally Posted By brotherdave Actually, I think Cinderella will be transformed from peasant dress to princess in her "exhibit".
Originally Posted By WilliamK99 They really need a live action show dad's could relate with in this new area...How about "The Dating Game" Where 3 lucky dads per day are picked to compete in earning a date with a Disney Princess lol.... I know I would attend....
Originally Posted By sleepingbe leobloom, i do not appreciate you calling Aurora a second rate princess. She is well loved by many. She is the head princess at all the Disneyland parks. I know many little girls ( and big ones) who adore her. So many people complained she wasn't present in WDW they finally brought her into the parks. I am thrilled she is getting a permanent home in FL and can't wait to see her cottage. Maybe if we're lucky she'll do m& g's in her peasant dress. Witches, back me up here. Someone is insulting our girl!
Originally Posted By magic0214 Kennect and Witches of Morva, I LOVE YOU GUYS! I so agree with you! I love this redo, and yes, i would enjoy making a b-day card for the princesses. I dont see how you guys dont like NEW! Hista98, I dont see how you can be se negitive, if you dont like this, then just go over to Mouseplanet.com, becuase some of us LPers dont enjoy negitive comments in every single topic on the boards
Originally Posted By leobloom >>becuase some of us LPers dont enjoy negitive comments in every single topic on the boards >> Ok, how's this for positive? I can't wait to make birthday cards for Aurora! She's going to love my cards better than your cards because I'm a better artist than you are! Maybe she'll be so impressed with my card she'll go on a date with me to the Beauty and the Beast restaurant? Or who cares about the date, maybe she'll make out with me backstage! Or better yet we'll go around to the other Meet-and-Greets and booty dance with Cinderella and then round up the other princesses and pixies and head to the clubs on Orange Ave and get hammered! Is it too late to ditch the E-ticket ride and just add more Meet-and-Greets?? Yeah, sign me up for this new Fantasyland expansion!!
Originally Posted By brotherdave You know, Little Mermaid, Beauty & the Beast restaurant, even the new Dumbo area, are definitely positive aspects of this makeover. But to excited about the Coloring Cottage, come on! No can do. Yes, most of the new area will look pretty, but not much else. Why not a Pinocchio ride? An updated Mr. Toad? How about the once propose Headless Horseman attraction? Those sound much better than character meet & greets. If they were to fit those m&g's into and around the other attractions, I can live with that and say, "hmm, nice theming". But to make the CENTRAL ATTRACTIONS along with the highly anticipated, bona fide Little Mermaid attraction, that bothers me. Just look at Disneyland's Fantasyland and tell me which concept is better. Sorry, but I'm afraid selling Princess dresses to little girls is outweighing true entertainment options here. I just can't be impressed with these lesser, so called "attractions".
Originally Posted By Hista98 I know she has the ride withces but with all the other princesses getitng elaborete new areas she is stuck with an alomost 40 year old ride, and nothing else.
