Originally Posted By SingleParkPassholder <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowpie" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C owpie</a>
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guano" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G uano</a>
Originally Posted By DAR So does anyone want to offer an idea on how to deal with North Korea or is that too hard?
Originally Posted By jonvn Not much to do. They'll likely try and sell their nuclear bomb to some terrorist for some badly needed cash, and then it'll get detonated over an American city. We're took weak willed to do anything about it, so tens of thousands of people will die.
Originally Posted By DAR The Chicago Bears defense came up with a plan for North Korea CHICAGO--Fed up with the Korean dictator's blatant disregard for international law, the Chicago Bears defense, the most feared, hard-hitting defense in the NFL, told Kim Jong Il today to "cut the crap" or they would travel to Korea and rip his head off. "Kim Jong Il really just needs to cut the crap," said linebacker Brian Urlacher. "He talks real tough, but we're not intimidated by him. In fact, if he doesn't stop with all the nuclear weapons-building, me and a few friends of mine I like to refer to as 'the Bears defense' are going to hop on a plane to North Korea or South Korea or wherever the heck he lives and snap his little neck. We will not let him threaten this nation, and we will not let him draw attention away from our undefeated season." Defensive tackle Tommie Harris, who has 5 sacks this year, also had a little message for the communist dictator. "Cease and desist, man. Stop with the games," Harris said at a press conference Sunday. "You're threatening global stability. If we have to come over there, little man, it's not going to be pretty. Blood will be shed. Heads will be slammed in car doors. Just ask JP Losman. We made his life miserable today, and his only crime was that he's kind of a pretty boy." The Bears defense has terrorized the NFL this year, allowing just 7.2 points per game after 5 games. Their roster boasts some of the hardest hitters in the league, such as Urlacher, Harris, and defensive end Alex Brown. Losman, who left Sunday's game battered, bruised, and demoralized, wasn't surprised that the Bears decided to send a message to Kim Jong Il. "They are an aggressive, in-your-face defense," Losman said. "I would certainly take them seriously if I was that Korean guy. I mean, I'm not sure how they'd manage to get into the country since its such a reclusive regime, but they did get into our backfield so I guess anything's possible. Of course, to get into our backfield all you have to do is make a menacing face at the lineman and then walk by him." Hours after the Bears warned North Korea, South Koreans officials reported mysterious troops movements near the country's border. An unidentified South Korean diplomat said the country may be preparing for another nuclear test in order to "flex its muscles" in response to Urlacher's and Harris's statements. "North Korea right now is responding to what it perceives to be aggressive statements by the Chicago Bears defense," the diplomat said. "They want everybody to know that if the Bears follow through with their threats they have the capability to respond. The situation is now worse than it was before. Thanks a lot, jerks. Maybe you should wait till you've played a few more decent offense before you start making threats." Unfortunately, the Bears would not back down from their statements. This time it was linebacker Lance Briggs who threw down the gauntlet. "Oh, what, they're going to test another nuclear bomb now? Big deal," he said. "They barely even got the first test right. You tell that little troll that if he wants to mix it up, we're ready for him. We don't back down from anybody. We didn't back down from the Buffalo Bills, the Seattle Seahawks, or the Minnesota Vikings. And those guys at least had some semblance of a game plan. Well, not the Bills, unless you consider falling down a game plan."
Originally Posted By vbdad55 ^^^^^^^^^ LOL !! that's OK- the Arizona Cardinals say they have found a fatal flaw in the defense and will exploit it Monday ---hahahahahahhahahahaha - oh brother.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <We're took weak willed to do anything about it, so tens of thousands of people will die.> And yet you apparently vote for the party of the weak willed. Based on what you said in another thread, I guess that means you can't complain when North Korea bombs us.
Originally Posted By jonvn "And yet you apparently vote for the party of the weak willed." For some reason, you think I vote Republican. Not always.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <For some reason, you think I vote Republican.> No, I don't. If I did, I wouldn't have guessed you vote for the party of the weak willed. There's only one party that consistently votes for weakness in the face of our enemies, and it's not the Republicans.
Originally Posted By jonvn Yes, Roosevelt and JFK were weak willed. So was Johnson. Let's see, who was a weak willed Democrat? Um...Carter. Yeah, he was bad. I guess he was so bad, they're still living him down. Beyond that, our Republican government, controller of both houses of Congress and the Presidency, are doing basically nothing about this. So, you really don't have a lot of heft to this argument.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Yes, Roosevelt and JFK were weak willed. So was Johnson.> Telling that you need to go back 40 years for examples of Democrats that aren't "weak willed". <Beyond that, our Republican government, controller of both houses of Congress and the Presidency, are doing basically nothing about this.> And yet more than the previous administration.
Originally Posted By jonvn No, it's not telling. I simply didn't include Clinton, whom I wouldn't call necessarily call weak willed, either. The only one of the bunch I would call weak willed was Carter. "And yet more than the previous administration." Well, no. That's not true.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <I simply didn't include Clinton, whom I wouldn't call necessarily call weak willed, either.> Only Presidents can be strong or weak willed? What about the current leaders of Democrat party? Do you actually think they are strong in the face of the enemy? <Well, no. That's not true.> If you want to call appeasing evil doing something, I guess you can say the previous administration did something.
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<Only Presidents can be strong or weak willed? What about the current leaders of Democrat party? Do you actually think they are strong in the face of the enemy?>> At times being strong willed is pursuing peace when the popular choice would be war. That's the type of strong will that Christ possessed.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <At times being strong willed is pursuing peace when the popular choice would be war.> Pursuing peace doesn't mean ignoring (or worse, rewarding) evil.
Originally Posted By jonvn "Only Presidents can be strong or weak willed?" Since I never said that, I don't feel a response is necessary. "If you want to call appeasing evil doing something" You mean like how Bush I used to have the fine folks of the Taliban over for tea at the White House? Yes, that is something, isn't it.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Since I never said that, I don't feel a response is necessary.> And yet you made one. You certainly haven't mentioned any strong willed Democrats who are active in politics today. <You mean like how Bush I used to have the fine folks of the Taliban over for tea at the White House?> No, I was thinking of things that really happened, like how the Clinton adminstration gave North Korea fuel oil and eased sanctions and then sat back and allowed them to continue developing nuclear weapons.
Originally Posted By RoadTrip <<And yet you made one. You certainly haven't mentioned any strong willed Democrats who are active in politics today.>> Hillary.
