Originally Posted By ecdc "It's also a fact that the UN did not disapprove of a US invasion of Iraq." This might just be one of the funniest lines in WEs history. If that's not spinning, then I don't know what is.
Originally Posted By ecdc I'd be excited about the news that they may not have exploded a nuclear (oops, sorry, a nucular) weapon, but conflicting intelligence like that is what Bush calls a "slam dunk." Even if only Laura and Bush's pet goldfish supported him, he won't back down from his do nothing attitude towards North Korea!
Originally Posted By jonvn "And yet you made one" Not really, no. "No, I was thinking of things that really happened" Yes, why don't you tell us what really happened, then.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 <<<And yet you made one. You certainly haven't mentioned any strong willed Democrats who are active in politics today.>> Hillary. < yeah, until Lieberman got whacked for his stance, then she has backed off. I have got to check out that Clinton shrine next time I am in Minn.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <Not really, no.> I agree it wasn't much of one. <Yes, why don't you tell us what really happened, then.> I'm not sure what you mean. I did tell you something that really happened.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh <If that's not spinning, then I don't know what is.> Spinning is what you do.
Originally Posted By MissesAnngie those northern koreans who like hot nukes need a good ol taste of our home cooking. whats for dinner you ask of me? i will tell you now, invasion and conquering that asian place to show them this fuly armed and operational batlestation aka the good ol USA
Originally Posted By jonvn "I'm not sure what you mean. I did tell you something that really happened." No you didn't. You made mention of some subjective material for which you have no proof.
Originally Posted By DouglasDubh What happened between the Clinton administration and North Korea during the 90's is all documented fact.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 ^^^^^^^ you either want to talk seriously about this or want to be childish, the choice is yours
Originally Posted By jonvn I already spoke seriously about it. When I get a serious response, i will continue.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 I seriously believe anyone that can include telling kids about Santa Claus as a comparsion to lying to 280 million people while holding the office of the president of the US wouldn't know a serious response if it was delivered by the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy. You're being silly, you've bbuilt a strawman that can stand up to the discussion and you know it. But if you think that lying about something like that doesn't lend credence to the fact that he would then lie about anything ( and likely did ) - then you stick to that story...
Originally Posted By jonvn "You're being silly, you've bbuilt a strawman that can stand up to the discussion and you know it." Tell me what the strawman is. Tell me what argument I put in someone else's mouth.
Originally Posted By vbdad55 Comparing telling kids about Santa Claus to lying to the American public while president of the US.....or is that really a serious argument ?
