Originally Posted By FerretAfros >>I am so sick of seeing pictures of NOS I could puke.<< You're not continually outraged by the outrageousness that is this despicable outrage?! Treason! Anybody who isn't constantly outraged by the photos must be some sort of Disney hater... ...or at least that's the sense I get from certain other websites out there
Originally Posted By berol I apologize for Disney. Disney was drunk. Disney won't do it again. Take Disney back. Please, take Disney back. Disney loves you. Disney doesn't know what it will do without you. Disney will change. Disney promises to change. Disney will go into couples therapy with you. Disney will do anything to get you back. Please, oh please, [guest name].
Originally Posted By CuriousConstance Hey, I love Disney along with the rest of them, but I doubt I'll ever have many feelings of "outrage" over much of anything they decide to do. I may prefer something else, I may wish they'd do this or that instead, I might be a bit sad about something or other being changed, but I can't imagine anything causing me to be outraged. If I hated it that much, I'd just move on to something else, you know?
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "You're not continually outraged by the outrageousness that is this despicable outrage?! Treason! Anybody who isn't constantly outraged by the photos must be some sort of Disney hater..." Or apologist.
Originally Posted By berol That's what inspired my post, cuz apologist is a weird word for agreeing. Nobody ever apologizes until now. And then I went desperate/obsessive.
Originally Posted By CuriousConstance I liked your post. I kept trying to think of what they call it when you don't hate and complain about everything Disney does, apologist!
Originally Posted By smd4 It was either "apologist" or "sheep." I didn't want to insult sheep, though.
Originally Posted By berol Anyone who says sheep on local TV news facebook pages gets an instant 10-foot pole between me and them. I have yet to see one not believe in crazy things.
Originally Posted By Ohana I haven't seen the new Club yet, but will in a few weeks. Details to follow... but in the meantime I agree some of hte bridge work left a lot to be desired
Originally Posted By Tikiduck I always thought the Club 33 thing was about being discreet, but now it is obvious to everyone that there is a lovely place in Disneyland that is reserved for a privileged few. I guess some could say that Disneyland itself is reserved for a privileged few.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "I always thought the Club 33 thing was about being discreet..." It was when you had to be a corporate sponsor to gain membership, but who doesn't know that it exists today? Maybe the tourists who aren't frequent visitors, but I think any person living in Southern California is aware of its existence. What's the big deal about the Club being visible to public anyway?
Originally Posted By Tikiduck The big deal is that so many of us are not allowed inside the place. Sure, we always knew it was there, but it was very low key. Now there is this big luxurious, expanded and improved entertainment complex right in the middle of NOS where none but the wealthy can relax, dine in style, and enjoy an alcoholic beverage. I don't know about you, but it bugs me that only rich people can have a drink in Disneyland. Whats next, Corporateland? I can see it now, Armani and Tom Ford boutiques, and a themed ride through the Hamptons in a brand new Ferrarri.
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt "The big deal is that so many of us are not allowed inside the place." You are allowed, however have to pay the membership fee. Maybe you can't afford it, but the place is no longer private and hasn't been for a long, long time. If you can't afford to admission to DL does it mean you're not allowed? No. "I don't know about you, but it bugs me that only rich people can have a drink in Disneyland." Why should it bother me? Club 33 has always been exclusively for well heeled patrons. What bothers me more is that I can't order beer or wine with dinner at the Blue Bayou. Not only is it annoying it's silly. "Whats next, Corporateland?" Ironic that you would say this when Club 33 was originally a private club where Walt Disney and Disney managers would court DL's corporate sponsors.
Originally Posted By perlster "I don't know about you, but it bugs me that only rich people can have a drink in Disneyland." Why should it bother me? Club 33 has always been exclusively for well heeled patrons. What bothers me more is that I can't order beer or wine with dinner at the Blue Bayou. Not only is it annoying it's silly. ----------------------- Consistency is hard!
Originally Posted By Dr Hans Reinhardt Well yes, but the point is that I don't care about the exclusivity. The no alcohol rule at DL has been in place since the beginning and has nothing to do with Club 33.
Originally Posted By Yookeroo "Why should it bother me? Club 33 has always been exclusively for well heeled patrons. What bothers me more is that I can't order beer or wine with dinner at the Blue Bayou. Not only is it annoying it's silly." I'm with you. There are lots of places I'm not allowed. Meh. But having a grown up drink with grown up meal seems a no-brainer.
Originally Posted By smd4 >>>The big deal is that so many of us are not allowed inside the place.<<< There are a great many places in the world that you're not allowed to go inside. This "entitled" attitude is appalling.
